نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیأت علمی، گروه پاتوبیولوژی و علوم آزمایشگاهی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی خراسان شمالی، بجنورد، ایران.

2 دانشجو، عضو کمیته تحقیقات دانشجویی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی خراسان شمالی، بجنورد، ایران.

3 عضو هیأت علمی، گروه آموزش بهداشت و ارتقاء سلامت، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی خراسان شمالی، بجنورد، ایران.

چکیده

کلاس معکوس یک مدل برنامه درسی مؤثر و پیشرفته است که سبب یادگیری با دوام و عمیق می‌گردد. این مطالعه برای ارزیابی درس ایمنی شناسی به روش کلاس معکوس از دیدگاه دانشجویان علوم پزشکی خراسان شمالی اجرا شد.
در این مطالعه توصیفی_تحلیلی تعداد 129 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی خراسان شمالی با روش طبقه‌بندی بر اساس دانشکده و رشته با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده وارد مطالعه شدند. کلاس معکوس ایمنی شناسی از طریق درگیر شدن فراگیران در فعالیت‌های پیش کلاسی انجام شد. حل کردن مسئله، بحث در گروه‌های کوچک و ترسیم نقشه مفهومی از وظایف فراگیران در کلاس بود. ارزیابی با استفاده از پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته انجام شد. از نرم افزار گراف پد پریزم برای آنالیز آماری اطلاعات استفاده شد. نتایج با استفاده آزمون مجذور کای برای متغیرهای کیفی و آنالیز واریانس یک طرفه برای متغیرهای کمی صورت گرفت.
نتایج ما نشان داد در مؤلفه‌های مختلف، گویه‌های غنای علمی محتواهای ارائه شده، مدیریت کلاس توسط مدرس، فرصت طرح سؤال توسط فراگیر، انجام کار گروهی توسط دانشجویان بالاترین میزان مطلوبیت و گویه‌های تبیین مفاهیم مشکل و پیچیده، ایجاد فرصت برابر برای فراگیران در کلاس، فرصت لازم برای بازخورد کتبی یا شفاهی به دانشجو، آمادگی قبلی دانشجو از کم‌ترین میزان مطلوبیت برخودار بودند.
ما نتیجه گرفتیم ایمنی شناسی به صورت کلاس معکوس از طریق انگیزه یادگیری، تعامل و بحث بین فراگیران، ارتباط بین فعالیت‌های پیش و درون کلاسی می‌تواند سبب یادگیری عمیق‌تر گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Teaching Immunology through Flipped-classroom Model from Students' Perspective in NKUMS

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hasan Namdar Ahmadabad 1
  • Sara Yousefi Tabari 2
  • Seyed Hamid Hosseini 3

1 Faculty member, Department of Pathobiology and Labratory Sciences, School of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.

2 Student, Member of student research committee, School of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.

3 Faculty member, Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The flipped classroom (FC) is a progressive, effective curricular model, which makes learning deeper and more durable. This study was carried out for quantitative and qualitative assessment of immunology course as FC from NKUMS students’ perspectives.
In this descriptive analytical study, 129 students of NKUMS which were classified according to their faculty and field of study, and sampled by Stratified random sampling. Immunology FC was carried out by engaging students in pre-class activities. Problem solving, small group discussions and drawing concept map were assignments of students in class. For assessment, we used a researcher made questionnaire. Moreover, GraphPad Prism software was used for statistical analysis of the data. And then, the results were analyzed using Chi-square test for qualitative data and One-way ANOVA for quantitative data.
Ultimately, Our results showed in different scales, subscales of valuable content provided, classroom management by teacher, opportunity for questioning by learner, and doing group work by students have gained the highest desirability; and subscales of explaining complex concepts, equal opportunities for learners, opportunity for written and verbal feedback to learners, and previous learner preparation have obtained the lowest desirability. According tothe results, it is concluded that immunology course as FC can cause deeper learning through learning motivation, interaction and discussion between learners, and link between pre- and in-class activities.  
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Immunology
  • Fipped Classroom
  • Assessment
  • Student
Abbasi Kasani H, Haji Zeynalabdini M, Reisi A 2018, Classroom management for unmotivated students. J Med Edu Dev, Vol. 12, No.4, Pp. 227_238 [In Persian].
Adib-Hajbaghery M, Arabi Matin Abadi MJ, Ghadirzadeh Z, et al 2017, Interest in the Field of Study and Affecting Factors: The Viewpoint of Students of Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. Vo.17, No.79, Pp. 24_34 [In Persian].
Ainsworth S 2008, The educational value of multiple_representations when learning complex scientific concepts. Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. Springer Vol. 3, Pp. 191_208
Barua A, Gubbiyappa KS, Baloch HZ,et al 2014, Validation of feedback questionnaire on Flipped Classroom (FC) activity. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education&Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, Pp. 339_349.
Chowdhury RR, Kalu G 2004, Learning to give feedback in medical education. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, Vol. 6, No. 4, Pp. 243_247.
Chodorow S 1996, Educators must take the electronic revolution seriously. Acad Med, Vol. 71, Pp. 221_226.
Danker B 2015, Using flipped classroom approach to explore deep learning in large classrooms. IAFOR Journal of Education, Vol. 3, Pp. 171_186.
Delves PJ, Martin SJ, Burton DR, et al 2017, Essential immunology, John Wiley&Son, .New Jersey.
Fatemi S, Moosavi S, Nikro R, et al 2017, Exploration of medical sciences students and educational custodians view about educational equity in clinical environment. Research in Medical Education, 8, Pp. 1_10.
Fatima SS, Arain FM, Enam SA 2017, Flipped classroom instructional approach in undergraduate medical education. Pakistan journal of medical sciences,Vol. 33, Pp. 1424.
Hejazi E, Borjali Loo S 2007, Critical thinking: gender or degree? Journal of Women's Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, Pp. 14_28. [In Persian].
Hoy AW, Weinstein CS 2006, Student and teacher perspectives on classroom management. Handbook of Classroom Management. Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Jahanbakhsh O, Darvishpoure E 2010, The attitude of Azad university professor and staffs toward effective strategies reducing resistance to changes. Journal of Educational Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 8, Pp. 149_167. [In Persian].
Jiang T, Zhou C 2015, The past, present and future of immunotherapy against tumor. Translational lung cancer research, Vol. 4, No. 3, Pp. 253.
Mclaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, et al 2014, The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, Vol. 89, No. 2, Pp. 236_243.
Memon S, Goswami P, Iqbal AI, et al 2016, Second year mbbs students’views about flipped class room practice in neuroanatomy course. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute (Peshawar-Pakistan), Vo. 30, No. 3, Pp. 244_249.
Moffett J 2015, Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Medical Teacher, Vol. 37, Pp. 331_336.
Murphy K, Weaver C 2016, Janeway's immunobiology. Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Nguyen NT, Raskopf E, Shah-Hosseini K, et al 2016, A review of allergoid immunotherapy: is cat allergy a suitable target? Immunotherapy, Vol. 8, Pp. 331_349.
O'flaherty J, Phillips C 2015, The use of flipped classrooms inhigher education: A scoping review. The internet and higher education, Vol. 25, Pp. 85_95.
Saif AK, Hosseini Largani M 2000, Comparison of student's learning styles by gender, degree and field of study. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, Vol. 7, No. 1(19), Pp. 93_114. [In Persian].
Sams A, Bergmann J 2013, Flip your students' learning. Educational leadership, Vol. 70, Pp. 16_20.
Vali A 2007, Storytelling: an effective method for teaching complicated concepts in medicine. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, Vol. 7, Pp. 155_160.
Werth EP, Werth L 2011, Effective training for millennial students. Adult Learning, Vol. 22, Pp. 12_19.
Yamani N, Jafae R, Karimi H, et al 2015, Medical, nursing and radiology students Readiness for Interprofessional Education in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. J Med Educ Dev, Vol. 8, No. 17, Pp. 113_121. [In Persian].
Zhang Z, LIU W, Han J, et al 2013, A trialof patient_oriented problem-solving system for immunology teaching in China: a comparison with dialectic lectures. BMC medical education, Vol. 13, Pp. 11