نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

عضو هیأت علمی گروه علوم پایه، دانشکده پیراپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز، تبریز، ایران

10.22118/edc.2021.283138.1780

چکیده

هدف: ارزشیابی کتاب های آموزشی از ضروریات تدوین برنامه های آموزشی است. بنابراین، مطالعه پیش رو به ارزیابی کتاب "انگلیسی برای دانشجویان پزشکی" از سری کتاب های انگلیسی تخصصی دانشگاهی نسل نوین سمت می پردازد.
روش کار: نه نفر از اساتید دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز (پنج متخصص زبان انگلیسی و چهار متخصص رشته پزشکی) به عنوان ارزیابان این کتاب بصورت داوطلبانه در این مطالعه شرکت  نموده و  علاوه بر تکمیل چک لیست ارزشیابی کتاب های انگلیسی برای اهداف ویژه، در یک جلسه مصاحبه شفاهی نیزشرکت نمودند.
یافته ها: نتایج تحلیل کیفی داده های حاصل از چک لیست ها و مصاحبه ها نشان داد که  این اثر در مقایسه با همتای پیشین خود به لحاظ ظاهری پیشرفت خوبی داشته و به نظر جذاب تر و خواندنی تر شده است. متون اصیل، تمرینات مکفی و منسجم، توجه ویژه به نحوه تدریس واژگان و تدریس القایی دستور از ویژگی های مثبت این کتاب می باشند. هر چند، عدم تطابق لازم محتوایی با سرفصل وزارتی دروس زبان تخصصی 1 و 2 پزشکی، عدم توجه به آواشناسی، مهارت های شنیدار، گفتار، تا حدی نوشتار، و جوهره اساسا عمومی- محور متون و واژگان از نکاتی هستند که این کتاب را از تئوری های آموزش زبان انگلیسی دور کرده و در رفع نیازهای زبانی دانشجویان و در مقایسه با معادل های بین المللی در رتبه پایین تر قرار می دهد.
نتیجه گیری: این کتاب علیرغم برخورداری از محاسن غیر قابل انکار، تناسب کافی و لازم برای تدریس به عنوان زبان تخصصی 1 و 2 پزشکی را ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Evaluation of the book “English for the Students of Medicine” by New Generation of SAMT through the perception of English and medical professors

نویسندگان [English]

  • Assef Khalili
  • Simin Sattarpour
  • Maryam Zeinolabedini

Faculty member, Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz , Iran

چکیده [English]

Porpose: Evaluation of educational textbooks is indispensable to curriculum development. Thus, the present study was an attempt to critically evaluate the newly-developed EAP textbook for medical students published by SAMT.
Methods: Nine ESP professors (five English professors and four medical professors) at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences completed a framework for ESP book evaluation. Moreover, they answered certain questions of this evaluation checklist in an interview session. The data were analyzed qualitatively.
Findings: The results revealed that this book has improved in terms of layout and looks more inviting compared to its previous counterpart. Other distinguishing features of the book were found to be authentic texts, sufficient and coherent exercises, special attention to inductive teaching of grammar and vocabulary. However, lack of expected congruence between the topics introduced in this book and those suggested by the Ministry of Health and Medical Education for medical ESP courses is one of the hindering factors for the target students to meet their language needs. The topics of reading comprehension texts and new vocabularies have been relatively close to the topics and words which to be observed in most of the general English books. In addition, listening, speaking, to some extent writing, and pronunciation skills have been ignored in this book, as a strong reason to claim that it has been far from theoretical considerations in the field of language teaching and learning.
Conclusion: Despite having indisputable merits, this textbook seemed not to be suitable for the target course.
Meta-analysis of Psychological Interventions’ Effectiveness (psycho-educational) on Students' Self-Efficacy Using Howitt and Cramer methods in Iran (2005)
Introduction: Textbook compilation, as an integral part of ESP, plays a key role in meeting students’ needs and interests as well as realizing the objectives of an educational course plan. Compiling a textbook is often viewed as a daunting task by most university teachers who generally pick out a particular book from among a diverse array of available textbooks. However, the particularities of a given educational context have to be considered in order to be sure of introducing the proper textbook for a group of learners, and that has been resulted in textbook evaluation comes in, which was viewed as indispensable component of curriculum development. Textbooks published by SAMT publications have been often the first choice by most ESP teachers in Iran. However, the effectiveness of these textbooks have been seldom evaluated to inform future decisions regarding the choice of content. Thus, the present study aimed at critically evaluating the newly-developed EAP textbook for medical students published by SAMT.
Methods: To this end, nine academic staff members of Tabriz university of Medical Sciences, including five English professors and four medical professors were selected through purposive and convenenience sampling. The book under evaluation consisted of 12 units each of which comprised two reading passages along with the following subsections: check up, digest what you read, reading strategy, vocabulary shot, grammar injection, translation and self-ckeck. The evaluation tool drawn on was the checklist developed by Mahmoodi and Ahmadisafa which included three main components, namely descriptive, objective and content evaluation. The first two components of evaluation were carried out by English professors while the last component was done by medical professors. The validity of the checklist was established through qualitative method based on English experts’ opinions while the reliability was calculated by cronbach’s alpha. For the quantitative part of the research, the book and checklist were emailed to the evaluators who returned their evaluations within the specified time. As for the qualitative part, interviews were held with the participants to collect their answers regarding the open-ended questions of the checklist. The content of the interviews were analyzed qualitatively for each item, and the scores given to each item in the objective evaluation were brought into play.
Results and Discussion: The findings were based on the views of the participants who answered the questions asked through the checklist as well as the interview. The book under evaluation has improved in terms of layout and looked more inviting compared to its previous counterpart. Other distinguishing features of the book were found to be authentic texts, sufficient and coherent exercises. Utilizing novel methods of introducing new words in the book in order to better retention along with getting benefit from inductive teaching of grammar instead of deductive methods were among positive points regarding the new edition of the book (Hill, 2013). In addition, it seems that the authors were fully cognizant of the significance of avoiding national, religious, cultural, or gender bias. Originality of the texts and the coherence between the contents and the assignments was another advantage.
However, despite the authors’ belief, the book is general in nature rather than special English due to the topics of reading comprehension texts and new vocabularies which are relatively close to the topics and words mostly observed in general English books. What is more, the topics are not much congruent with ministerial headings for medical ESP courses. Grading criteria of the book lessons could have been more sophisticated in a way that the final lessons enjoy a higher level language in comparison to the first ones (Ellis, 2012; Richards, 2015). As to language skills, today, ignoring listening, speaking, and writing skills together with pronunciation was outdated (Rajabi & Farahian, 2020) and far from theoretical considerations in the field of language teaching and learning. Thus, curriculum developers and authors would rather put a spotlight on the integration of skills. In a nutshell, despite having indisputable merits, this textbook seemed not to be suitable for the target course.
Conclusion: All in all, on the basis of the collective opinions of the experts the book was found to have been significantly improved compared to its predecessors, especially from the point of appearance, the diversity of exercise types and the way of the passages were presented. However, there were also shortcomings highlighted by both teacher groups. The medical teachers judged the texts as too general and remarked that the book failed to fully meet their expections with respect to tapping specialized vocabulary and knowledge. The English experts, on the other hand, criticized the book as too reading based, still falling short of accommodating the other language skills. It is hoped that, the finidings of the present research will be considered in compiling future ESP books tailored to students’ needs, and better meeting today’s requirements.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • EAP
  • ESP
  • Medical Students
  • Textbook
  • Textbook Evaluation
Anthony L 2018, Introducing English for specific purposes, Routledge, New York.
Atai MR, Shoja L, Kafshgar Suteh M, et al 2019, English for the students of medicine, SAMT, Tehran, Iran.
Brown JD 1995, The elements of language curriculum, Heinle and Heinle Publishers, Boston.
Coffey A, Atkinson P 1996, Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Cohen BJ 2008, Medical terminology: An illustrated guide, Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia.
Denzin N K, Lincoln YS 2000, ‘The discipline and practice of qualitative research’, In N K Denzin, Y S Lincoln (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). (pp. 1-28), Sage, London, Pp.1-28.
Dudley-Evans T, St John M 1998, Developments in English for specific purposes: A multidisciplinary approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ellis R 2003, Task-based language learning and teaching, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ellis R 2012,  Language teaching research and language pedagogy, Wiley Blackwell, Oxford.
Florez MC. 1998, Improving adult ESL Learner’s pronunciation skills, ERIC Digest, Available at: http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/Pronun.html (Accessed: 15November 2015)
Foley J, Thompson L 2003, Language learning: A life long process, Edward Arnold, London.
Hill DA 2013, ‘The visual elements in EFL course books’, In B Tomlinson (ed.), Developing materials for language teaching, Bloomsbury, London, UK, Pp.157-166.
Hinkel E 2006, Current perspectives on teaching the four skills, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 1, Pp. 109-131.
Khalili A, Sattarpour S, Zeinolabedini M 2020, Upbeat General English course for Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Sanam, Tabriz.
Mahmoodi MH 2018, A critique of English for the students of engineering, Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, Vol.18, No. 8, Pp. 287-304. [In Persian].
Mahmoodi MH, Ahmadi Safa M 2015, A model-based evaluation of English for specific purposes (ESP) books, Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, Vol.14, No. 32, Pp. 113-133. [In Persian].
Maleki A, Kazemi M 2012, The evaluation and comparison of two most widely used textbooks for teaching English to the Iranian students of medicine, The Iranian EFL Journal, Vol.8, No. 3, Pp. 70-93.
McDonough J, Shaw C 2003, Materials and methods in ELT, Blackwell, Oxford.
Norouzi Khiabani M, Birjandi P 1990, English for the students of humanities I, SAMT, Tehran, Iran.
Pennington M 1994, ‘Recent research in L2 phonology: Implications for practice’, In J Morley (ed.) Pronunciation pedagogy and theory, New views, new directions, Pp. 92-108.
Rahimy R 2008, ESP, an evaluation of available textbooks: Medical terminology. Available at: http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_17/PDF/Ramin_Rahimy.pdf (Accessed: 4April 2021).
Rajabi Y, Farahian M 2020, Investigating Instructors' Expectations of ESP for B.A. Students of Nursing Jundishapur Education Development Journal, Vol. 11, No. 4, Pp. 764-773.
Razmjoo SA 2010, Developing a textbook evaluation scheme for the expanding circle, Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, Vol. 2, No.1, 121-136.
Razmjoo SA, Raissi R 2010, Evaluation of SAMT ESP textbooks for the students of medical sciences, Asian ESP Journal, Vol. 6, NO.2,108-150.
Richards JC 2015, Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Richards JC, Rodgers TS 2014, Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Shahidipour, V, Tahririan MH 2017, Evaluation of newly developed EAP textbooks for the students of medicine published by SAMT, Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, Vol. 4, No. 4, Pp. 47-65.
Taherkhani R, Karbakhsh Ravari R, Zamani Jamshidi R 2018, Evaluation of the ESP book ‘English for the Students of Sociology’, Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 8, Pp. 231-253. [In Persian].
Tahririan MH, Mehrabi F 2007, English for the students of medicine II, SAMT, Tehran, Iran.
Vygotsky L 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wang L 2007, Word association: Second language vocabulary acquisition and instruction, TESL Reporter, Vol. 40, No. 1, Pp. 49-66.
Wong J, Waring HZ 2010, Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy: A Guide for ESL/EFL Teachers. New York: Routledge.