نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران

2 عضو هیات علمی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی گرایش مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

10.22118/edc.2021.292316.1836

چکیده

امروزه مدیریت دانش به‌مثابه راهبردی ضروری و آینده‌نگر برای کسب مزیت رقابتی و حفظ بقاء و بهبود عملکرد سازمانی محسوب می‌شود. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی پدیدارشناسی مدیریت دانش در واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان آذربایجان غربی بود. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر شیوه اجرا توصیفی از نوع کیفی بود. جامعه پژوهش اعضای هیئت علمی واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان آذربایجان غربی در سال تحصیلی 400-1399 بودند که تعداد 18 نفر از آنها طبق اصل اشباع نظری و پس از بررسی ملاک‌های ورود به مطالعه با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با روش مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته گردآوری که روایی و پایایی آن مناسب ارزیابی شد. داده‌ها به شیوه تحلیل محتوا با روش هفت مرحله‌ای کلایزی در نرم‌افزار MAXQDA تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که هشت مضمون اصلی مدیریت دانش شامل زیرساخت‌ها و فناوری اطلاعات، فرایندهای مدیریت دانش، ساختار سازمانی و محیط، سرمایه‌های فکری و نوآور، منابع انسانی و آموزش، رهبری دانش، مدیریت و فرهنگ سازمانی بودند. با توجه به نتایج این پژوهش، برنامه‌ریزی برای بهبود مدیریت دانش از طریق مضامین مذکور ضروری است که برای این منظور می‌توان از کارگاه‌های آموزشی استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigate the phenomenological of knowledge management in the units of Islamic Azad University of West Azerbaijan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leyla Bahluli 1
  • Roghieh Vahdat Bourashan 2
  • Javad Keyhan 2
  • Bahareh Azizi Nejad 3

1 PhD Student of Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran

2 Faculty Member, Department of Educational Sciences, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Educational Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Today, knowledge management is considered as an essential and forward-looking strategy to gain a competitive advantage and maintain survival and improve organizational performance. The aim of this study was investigate the phenomenological of knowledge management in the units of the Islamic Azad University of West Azerbaijan province. This research in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative. The research population was the faculty members of units of the Islamic Azad University of West Azerbaijan in the academic year 2020-21, which number of 18 people of them were selected as a sample by purposive sampling according to the principle of theoretical saturation and after reviewing the inclusion criteria. Data were collected by semi-structured interview method, which its validity and reliability were assessed appropriate. Data were analyzed by method of content analysis by seven-step Colaizzi method in MAXQDA software. Findings showed that the eight main theme of knowledge management were included of infrastructure and information technology, knowledge management processes, organizational structure and environment, intellectual and innovative capital, human resources and education, knowledge leadership, management and organizational culture. According to the results of this study, planning to improve knowledge management through mentioned themes is essential that for this purpose can be used from workshops.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Phenomenology
  • Knowledge Management
  • Islamic Azad University

Antunes HDG, Pinheiro PG 2020. Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 140-149.

Barao A, De Vasconcelos JB, Rocha A, Pereira R 2017. A knowledge management approach to capture organizational learning networks. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 735-740.

Bootz J, Durance P, Monti R 2019. Foresight and knowledge management. New developments in theory and practice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 80-83.

Cabeza-Pulles D, Fernandez-Perez V, Roldan-Bravo MI 2020. Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research. European Management Journal, 38(3), 450-461.

Calvo N, Rodeiro-Pazos D, Rodriguez-Gulias MJ, Fernandez-Lopez S 2019. What knowledge management approach do entrepreneurial universities need? Information Systems, 85, 21-29.

Centobelli P, Cerchione R, Esposito E 2018. Aligning enterprise knowledge and knowledge management systems to improve efficiency and effectiveness performance: A three-dimensional Fuzzy-based decision support system. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 107-126.

Dehghani M, Yaghoubi NM, Mooghali A, Vazife Z 2019. A comprehensive model of factors affecting establishment of knowledge management. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 10(1) 109-132. [In Persian]

Durst S, Hinteregger C, Zieba M 2019. The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 105, 1-10.

Ekambaram A, Sorensen AO, Bull-Berg H, Olsson NOE 2018. The role of big data and knowledge management in improving projects and project-based organizations. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 851-858.

Ezzati M, Mirkamali SM, Sadeqi L 2016. The optimal model of knowledge management at the university in accordance with the vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 2025. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 4(13), 1-24. [In Persian]

Friedrich J, Becker M, Kramer F, et al 2020. Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 106, 341-352.

Haq M, Anwar S 2016. A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges. Cogent Business & Management, 3, 1-17.

Horng J, Liu C, Chou S, Huang Y 2020. The roles of university education in promoting students’ passion for learning, knowledge management and entrepreneurialism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44, 162-170.

Karimi M, Heydarinejhad S, Mehralizadeh Y 2020. Developing the succession management pattern based on knowledge management in the ministry of sport and youth based on grounded theory. Sport Management Studies, 12(61), 59-84. [In Persian]

Kartun A, Sanne JM, Aase K, et al 2020. Knowledge management infrastructure to support quality improvement: A qualitative study of maternity services in four European hospitals. Health Policy, 124(2), 205-215.

Keats B, Evans P 2020. Traditional knowledge and resource management in the northwest territories, Canada: Definitions, disciplinary divides, and reasons for decisions. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(4), 1309-1318.

Khalaj MM, Zareiyan A 2016) Design and implementation of knowledge management in the structural model fit of AJA University of medical sciences. Journal of Military Caring Sciences, 3(2), 69-79. [In Persian]

Ronaghi MH, Zeinodinzadeh S, Alambeladi S 2019. Identification and ranking the factors effecting the knowledge management implementation using metasynthesis method. Library and Information Sciences, 22(3), 112-135. [In Persian]

Sadri A 2019. Institutionalizing of knowledge management in Iranian universities. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12(43), 41-63. [In Persian]

Sedighi M, VanSplunter S, Zand F, Brazier F 2015. Evaluating critical success factors model of knowledge management: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(3), 17-36.

Tarhani F 2020. Identification of the factors involved in the implementation of KM in defense industries. Quarterly Journal Scientific Research of Strategic Defense Studies, 18(79), 201-229. [In Persian]

Tongsamsi K, Tongsamsi I 2017. Instrument development for assessing knowledge management of quality assurers in Rajabhat universities, Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 111-116.

Wu K, Gao S, Xia L, et al 2019. Enhancing corporate knowledge management and sustainable development: An inter-dependent hierarchical structure under linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 560-579.

Zouari M, Dakhli S 2018. A multi-faceted analysis of knowledge management systems. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 646-654.