مجله توسعه آموزش جندی شاپور اهواز

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

فرآیند داوری

طراحی و اعتبار یابی پرسشنامه برنامه درسی پنهان دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارومیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم تربیتی،واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز، ایران .

2 هیات علمی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

3 هیات علمی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تبریز ، دانشگاه تبریز، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضرطراحی و اعتبار و پایایی پرسشنامه برنامه درسی پنهان دانشجویان می­باشد. پژوهش از نوع توصیفی و ساخت ابزار است و در زمره پژوهش­های پیمایشی قرار می­گیرد. پرسشنامه اولیه با ترکیبی ازمطالعه اسناد و مدارک، پژوهش­ها و مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته با خبرگان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارومیه ، در 66 گویه طراحی شد. روایی صوری، روایی وابسته به محتوا به روش کمی و کیفی و روایی سازه با تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. پس از تعیین روایی محتوا به صورت کمی و کیفی و روایی سازه، پرسشنامه به 52 گویه کاهش یافت. ضریب لاوشه برای تمامی گویه­های پرسشنامه محاسبه گردید و برای تمامی گویه­ها بیش از 50% پاسخ دهندگان گزینه مناسب است را پاسخ دادند و ضریب لاوشه تمامی گویه­هایی بالای 42/0 به دست آمد، و در نهایت روایی تأیید گردید. نتیجه اینکه پرسشنامه برنامه درسی پنهان، روایی و پایایی مناسبی برخوردار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Design and validation of students' hidden curriculum of University of Science Urmia

نویسندگان [English]

  • Arsalan Morteza 1
  • Behnam Talebi 2
  • Yosof Adib 3

1 PhD student, Department of Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University of Tabriz, Iran.

2 Faculty, Department of Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran (Corresponding Author)

3 Faculty, Department of Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, University of Tabriz, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to design, validity and reliability of students' hidden curriculum questionnaire. The research is of descriptive and instrumental type and is in the category of survey research. The initial questionnaire was designed in 66 items with a combination of document study, research and semi-structured interviews with experts of Urmia University of Medical Sciences. Formal validity, content-dependent validity was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively, and construct validity was investigated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. After determining the content validity quantitatively and qualitatively and the construct validity, the questionnaire was reduced to 52 items. The threshold coefficient was calculated for all items of the questionnaire and for all items more than 50% of the respondents answered the appropriate option and the threshold coefficient of all items above/ 42. Was obtained, and their validity was finally confirmed. The result is that the hidden curriculum questionnaire has good validity and reliability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hidden curriculum
  • medical students
  • validation
  • validity
  • reliability
مراجع
Abbasi M, E'adi N, Shafi'i H, Pirani Z 2015, [The role of social well-being and academic vitality inpredicting nursing student's educational eagerness]. Educational Strategies in Medical Sciences; Vol.9., No.1, Pp. 50-54[Persian]
Abed Moghadam M, Balaghat SR 2016, Countervalving academic vitality for academic failure, 4th National Conference on Counseling and Mental Health. Vol.21., No.7, Pp. 100-110.
Coa Xiongfei M, Ayesha AA 2018, Excessive use of mobile social networking sites and poor academic performance: Antecedents and consequences from stressor-strain-outcome perspective, Journal: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.85 ., No.3 , Pp. 163-174.
Forouzandeh N, Aslani Y, Mehr Alian HA, Driss F 2016, The relationship between academic stress and students' quality of life, Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Volume 18, Number 3, Pages 1 to 7.
Hoover W 2009, The Futur of Human Resources. Technology Asissts In Streamling Your HR Department. Cobrado Biz. Vol.21., No.7 , Pp. 100-110.
Lee J 2001, A Grounded Theory: Integration and Internalization in ERP Adoption and Use, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebreska, In Proquest UMI Database. Vol.9., No.11, Pp. 365-374.
Levin HM, Wookjeong D, Ou D 2006. “What is a World-Class University?
Li YJ, Whalley S, Zhang X. et al 2008, The Higher Educational Transformation of China and its Global Implications. NBER Working, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Vol.47., No.11, Pp. 200-218.
Liverpool PR 2005, Building a World-Class University Positioning VirginiaTech to Compete in the International Arena. Vol.52., No.19, Pp. 154-169.
Martinpatricia Y, Turnerbarry A 1986, Grounded Theory and Organizational Research, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (2003), Oxford Pub. Vol.22., No.2 , Pp. 78-90.
Mohammadpour A, Mehdi R 2008, Semantic understanding of the consequences of modernization in the Oraman region of Iranian Kurdistan through field research. Iranian Journal of Sociology, Ninth, Vol.4 ., No.2 , Pp. 3-33[[in Persian].
Pandit NR 1996, The Creation of Theory: A Recent Application of the Grounded Theory Method, The Qualitative Report, Vol.2., No.4, Pp. 52-63.
Rajabi AA, Ashrafi B 2003, Universities: Approach to New Missions and Challenges, Proceedings of the 47th Meeting of Heads of Universities and Scientific and Research Centers, Tehran: Sanjesh Organization Publishing Center.
Safaei Movahed S, Bavafa D 2013, Factors Shaping the Hidden Curriculum in Higher Education in Iran: An Ethnographic Ethnography, Bi-Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, Volume 4, Number 7, pp. 30-53.
Salehi R 2013, Development of a theoretical model of academic counseling based on factors affecting academic success. PhD Thesis in Academic Career Counseling. Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Isfahan.
Salehiomran E 2011, Theoretical Perspectives on the Development of Higher Education, Two Scientific Research Monthly, Shahed University, Vol.11., No.5, Pp. 154-159[[in Persian].
Shahidi Sh, Sabri MR, Avijegan M 2016, Development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of performance improvement components of departments of Isfahan Medical School, Journal of Education in Medical Sciences, No. 20, pp. 11-1.
Solberg PA, Hopkins WG, Ommundsn Y, Halvari H 2012, Effects of three training types on vitality among older adults: A self- determination theory perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise; 13: 407- 417.
Strauss A, Glaser B 1992, Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Vol.56., No.98, Pp. 71-100.
ZandivanianNaini A, Khorani N, Rahimi M 2016, Academic Stress, Second National Conference on Sustainable Development in Educational Sciences and Psychology, Social and Cultural Studies.
Zhang Y, Gan Y, Cham H 2007, Perfectionism, academic burnout and engagement among Chinese college students A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1929-1540.
مجله توسعه آموزش جندی شاپور اهواز
دوره 13، شماره 1
خرداد 1401
صفحه 74-85
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار