نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیأت علمی، گروه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

2 دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی، گروه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

4 عضو هیأت علمی، بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان اراک، اراک، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر شناخت بایسته‌های عضو هیئت علمی اخلاق مدار در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بود. این پژوهش کیفی با استفاده از روش شش مرحله‌ای ساندلوسکی و باروسو ) انجام شده است. تیم فراترکیب متشکل از اعضای هیئت علمی متخصص در حوزه مدیریت آموزش عالی و آشنا به شیوه جستجو در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی، برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، برنامه‌ریزی درسی و مسلط به روش پژوهش فراترکیب بود. 26 منبع پژوهشی مرتبط، مبنای تحلیل قرار گرفت که نتیجه آن استخراج 10 بایسته اصلی عضو هیئت علمی اخلاق‌مدار در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شامل: بایسته‌های اخلاق فردی، بایسته‌های اخلاق آموزشی، بایسته‌های اخلاق پژوهشی، بایسته‌های اعتقادی، بایسته‌های اخلاق مدیریتی درون دانشگاهی، بایسته‌های اخلاق مدیریتی برون دانشگاهی، بایسته‌های اخلاقی تعامل، بایسته‌های اخلاقی مسئولیت پذیرانه و بایسته‌های اخلاقی عدالت گستری است. اعتبار داده‌ها با استفاده از تکنیک‌های اعتبارپذیری و انتقال‌پذیری از طریق خودبازبینی پژوهشگران و هم‌سوسازی داده‌ها و اعتمادپذیری و هم‌سوسازی پژوهشگران استفاده شد. با توجه به تاثیر بالای دانشگاه‌ها در آینده دانشجویان اهمیت تشخیص و رعایت اخلاق حرفه‌ای در این محیط‌ها مورد توجه ویژه می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Requirements of ethics-oriented faculty members in universities of medical sciences: A meta-synthesis approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Mohammadi 1
  • maryam shafiei servestani 1
  • Ghasem Salimi 1
  • Reza Naseri Jahromi 2
  • Fatemeh Mirghafari 3
  • maryam Seidi 4

1 Faculty Member, Department of Educational Planning and Management, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Ph. D. of Curriculum Development, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 M.A. Student, Department of Educational Planning and Management, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

4 Faculty member, Department of Management and Curriculum, Arak Farhangian University, Arak, Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to identify the requirements of ethics-oriented faculty members in universities of medical sciences. This qualitative study was conducted following the six-step method of Sandlowski and Barroso (2007). The meta-synthesis team consisted of faculty members specialized in the field of higher education management, familiar with the method of searching databases, educational planning, curriculum planning, and having a good command of meta-synthesis research method. Twenty-six relevant research sources were used as the basis for the analysis, which resulted in extracting 10 main requirements for ethics-oriented faculty members in universities of medical sciences. These included personal ethics, educational ethics, research ethics, faith, intra-university management ethics, inter-university management ethics, interaction ethics, responsibility ethics, and justice ethics. Data validation was done using validation and transferability techniques through researchers’ self-review and data alignment as well as researchers' reliability and alignment. Due to the pivotal role of universities in the future of students, the importance of recognizing and observing professional ethics in these environments is of special interest.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Faculty member
  • Ethics
  • Universities of medical sciences
Bandali B, Abolghasemi M, Pardakhti MH, Rezaeizadeh M (1397). Pathology of faculty growth programs of Shahid Beheshti University, Human Resources Education and Development, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 25-53.[Persian]
Abtahi SH, Mwla'ii N (1386) The relatinship between prfessinal cmmitment and rganizatinal measures mnthly, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 36 – 42. [Persian]
Alaui L, Sandrni A (2018). Predestinatin and the Prtestant ethic. Jurnal f the Eurpean Ecnmic Assciatin, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 45 – 76.
Albafyan M (1388) Develped the key cncepts f prfessinal ethics in educatinal administratin at the graduate schl f the University f Tehran, Master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 162 – 181.
Ameli M (1381) Examine the theretical fundatins f prfessinal ethics in Islam, Master's thesis, Institute f Philsphy, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 11 – 18. [Persian]
Andersn DW (2020). The Ethic of Care and Inclusive Educatin. Hw Shall We Then Care?: A Christian Educatr’s Guide t Caring fr Self, Learners, Clleagues, and Cmmunity, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 112 – 119.
Ardi R, Budiarti D (2020). The role of religious beliefs and cllective narcissism in interreligius cntact n university students. Heliyn, Vol. 6, No. 9, pp. 39 – 49.
Bilba J, García D, Rebllar C et al (2016). Beynd the Digital Cmpetence: Cmputatinal Thinking. INTED2016 Prceedings. https://di. rg/10.21125/inted.
BirniKashani R, Bagheri K (1386) Principles and ethics f teaching ethics, prfessinal ethics, and the civilizatin f Islam, Tehran, Scial and Cultural Studies Publicatins, First Editin, Vol. 13, No. 24, pp. 213 – 225. [Persian]
Bruner J (1996). Cultural educatin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 45 – 50.
Ciulla JB (2020). Casuistry and the case fr business ethics. In The Search fr Ethics in Leadership, Business, and Beynd. Springer, Cham, Vol. 3, No. 9, pp. 137 – 152.
Dartmi M, Karimi Mnaghi H, Etezad Razavi et all (2020). Imprvement f indexes f faculty members' Recruitment: The views f the experts. Future f Medical Educatin Jurnal, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 21 – 30. [Persian]
Davis R, Waltn E (2007), Cllege f Cmmerce and Industry, schl f Accuntancy Clemsn University, Vol. 17, No. 18, pp. 79 – 96.
Dewey J (1963). Experience and educatin (2nd ed.). New Yrk, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 475 – 499.
Dulin C (2014). The pedaggical characteristics f advanced technlgy educatin-funded prfessinal develpment fr cmmunity cllege faculty. University f the Pacific, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 14 – 32.
Eckert T, Topping D, Abrams M et al (2020). Beyond academic learning: how can human cadaver dissection promote medical students’ professional identity development?. The FASEB Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 1-10.
Farahani MF, Farahani FF (2014). The study n prfessinal ethics cmpnents amng faculty members in the engineering. Prcedia-Scial and Behaviral Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 2085 – 2089. [Persian]
Frastkhah M (1385) Cde f ethics t prmte science educatin, Jurnal f Ethics in Science and Technlgy, Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 16 – 29. [Persian]
Friedman HH, Fgel J, Friedman LW (2015). Student perceptins f the ethics f prfessrs. Friedman, HH, Fgel, J., and Friedman, LW (2005). Student Perceptins f the Ethics f Prfessrs. Electrnic Journal f Business Ethics and organization Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 10 – 15.
Gbadamsi G (2014). Academic ethics: what has morality, culture and administration get t d with its measurement?. Management Decisin, Vol. 7, No. 12, pp. 152 – 174.
Golsha R, Charnaei T (2020). Educational Performance of Faculty Members from the Students and Faculty Members’ Point of View in Golestan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Clinical and Basic Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 6-13.
Gordon L, Rees CE,  Jindal‐Snape D (2020). Doctors’ identity transitions: Choosing to occupy a state of ‘betwixt and between’. Medical Education, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 40 – 49.
Guillaume Y (2017). Plaidyer en faveur de l’éthique d’une psture prfessinnelle. VST-Vie sciale et traitements, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 86 – 89.
Harrisn D, Patch A, McNally D et all (2020). Student and Faculty Perceptions f Study Helper Websites: A New Practice in Collaborative Cheating. Journal f Academic Ethics, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 1 – 18.
Judith VJZ (2019). Communicating competence, job motivating and teaching Performance. Economics & Education, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 7 – 17.
Jung YM (2020). Nursing students’ career identity, satisfaction with major, and career stress by career decision type. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 117 – 135.
Kersting F, Whnsiedler I, Wlf N (2020). Weber revisited: the protestant ethic and the spirit f natinalism. The Jurnal f Ecnmic Histry, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 710 – 745.
Khanijazani J (1387) Mrality and Cnscience in entrepreneurship, Journal f Ethics in Science and Technlgy, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 39 – 47.
Khazaee Z (1385) Applied ethics: the nature, methds and challenges, Journal f Scientific Research, University f Qm, Vol. 12, No. 13, pp. 124 – 139. [Persian]
Klhar M, Alameen A (2020). University learning with anti-plagiarism systems. Accuntability in Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1 – 21.
Kuther T L (2013). A prfile f the ethical prfessr: Student views. Cllege teaching, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 153 – 160.
Lane C, Schrynemakers I, Kim M (2020). Examining the Academic Effects f Develpmental Educatin Refrm: Faculty Perceptins frm a Large, Public, Urban University. Cmmunity Cllege Enterprise, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 27 – 58.
Le Grange L (2020). Research ethics: Examining the tensin between principlism and ratinal self-interest in a neliberal university cntext. Transfrmatin in Higher Educatin, Vol. 5, No. 8, pp. 12 – 16.
Li Y, Li W (2020). A Review f Research n Ethic f Care in Physical Educatin and Physical Activity Settings. Jurnal f Teaching in Physical Educatin, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1 –9.
Mashinchi A, Hashemi SA,  Khani KM (2017). A Mdel fr Cmpetency Assessment f the Faculty in Islamic Azad University. Internatinal Educatin Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 76 – 88. [Persian]
Mata L, Clipa Z, Tzafilku K (2020). The Develpment and Validatin f a Scale t Measure University Teachers’ Attitude twards Ethical Use f Infrmatin Technlgy fr a Sustainable Educatin. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 15, pp. 62 – 68.
McTiernan K, Gulln-Sctt F, Dudley R (2020). An explratin f strength use and its relatinship with life satisfactin, psitive self-beliefs and paranid ideatin. Internatinal Jurnal f Wellbeing, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 41 – 49.
Midfar S (1385) Ethics and its risk factrs amng emplyees f gvernment agencies, Jurnal f Scial Welfare, Sixth Year, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 124 – 138.
Nasirpuri Shadbad F, Baham C, Birs D (2020). A Qualitative Apprach t Understand Unintentinal Infrmatin Security Misbehavirs. Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 71 – 79. [Persian]
Nddings N (2012). The caring relatin in teaching. xfrd Review f Educatin, Vol. 3, No. 8, pp. 771 – 781.
Nddings N (2013). Caring: A relatinal apprach t ethics & mral educatin. Berkeley, CA: University f Califrnia Press. wens, L.M., & Ennis, C.D. (2005). The ethic f care in teaching: An verview f supprtive literature. Quest, Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 392– 425.
Norshahi N (2018). Place and rank f Iran in educatin, research and innvatin. Tehran, Institute f Higher educatin planning and research, Vol. 23, No. 11, pp. 114 – 123. [Persian]
Peng W (2020, August). Students’ Expectatin fr Educatinal Quality: Prgressive Participatry Discussin Teaching with Effect and Cnfirmatry Factr Analysis. In 2020 International Conference n Social Science, Economics and Educating Research (SSEER 2020), Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 48 – 51.
Qaramalaki F (1388) Ethics f Muslim civilization f Iran and Tehran, published by the Ministry f Cultural and Community Studies, Research and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 25, pp. 24 – 36. [Persian]
Rashidi F (1383) Examined the relationship between Islamic ethics, labor, organizational commitment and organizational change in attitude among city leaders, Master's thesis, University f lines, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 13 – 25. [Persian]
Rjas HL, Lara VL, Meza DG (2020). University Social Responsibility and Community Relatins. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 47-58.
Rluwene GW, Magnus-Arewa AE (2020). Attitude f Postgraduate Students towards Plagiarism in University f Prt Harcourt. Asian Journal f Education and Social Studies, Vol. 25, No. 32, pp. 28-38.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research, New York, New York: Springer.
Sarmadi M, Shalbaf S (1386) Ethics in Total Quality Management, Tehran, The Journal f Ethics in Science and Technology, Second Year, N. 3 and 4 -Ubenstein. S (2010), Prfessinal Ethics Report, Advancing Science, Vol. 13, No. 26, pp. 562 – 571. [Persian]
Snider MA (2014). Viewpoint Discriminating by Public Universities: Student Religious organizations and Villains of University Nondiscrimination Policies, Vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 84– 91.
Sultanzade M (1383). Study f work culture and work ethic of the community from a sociological perspective, Master's thesis, University Bahnar, Vol. 5, No. 12, pp. 451 – 463. [Persian]
Teacher Educatin Accreditatin Cuncil. (2011). Guide t accreditatin. Retrieved frm http://caepnet.rg/~/media/Files/caep/accreditatin
Ubenstein S (2010), Prfessinal Ethics Reprt, Advancing Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 11– 21.
Vadadhyr A (1387) Ethical standards in practice. Jurnal f Ethics in Science and Technlgy, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 132 – 151.
Valente S, Veiga-Branc A, Rebel H et all (2020). The relatinship between emtinal intelligence ability and teacher efficacy. Universal Jurnal f Educatinal Research, Vol. 3, No. 8, pp. 916-923.
Velasc PJ, Learreta B, Kber C et all (2014). Faculty Perspective n Cmpetency Develpment in Higher Educatin: An Internatinal Study. Higher Learning Research Cmmunicatins, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 85-100.
Vntz K, Clerc (2007). Cde f ethics, Nebraska prfessinal practices cmmissin, state f Nebraska -Campbell. E, Thiessen. D (2010), Perspectives n the Ethical Bases f Mral Agency in Teaching, university Trnt Canada, Infrmatin Eric, Vol. 5, No. 11, pp. 71 – 87.
Walz AR, Cx LA, Falls J et al (2020). Faculty & Student Panel Discussin: Issues in Curse Materials Access and Use, Vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 312 – 339.
Zandipr T (1388) Pathlgy f the wrk culture and ethics, research and cnsultancy News, Vol. 4, No. 16, pp. 3 – 15. [Persian]
Zhr H, khalj M (1389) Cmpnents Engineering Ethics, Jurnal f Engineering Educatin, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 81 – 95.