نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت آموزشی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، تهران، ایران.

3 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف ­ارائه الگوی مناسب صلاحیت­های حرفه­ای اعضای هیئت علمی واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی شهر تهران انجام شده است. روش پژوهش برحسب هدف، بنیادی -کاربردی برحسب نوع داده، آمیخته (کیفی-کمّی) بود. جامعۀ آماری در بخش کیفی پژوهش، شامل خبرگان آموزش‌ عالی بودند که بر اساس نمونه گیری هدفمند، 20 نفر انتخاب شدند. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش در بخش کمّی،  شامل تمام اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه های آزاد شهر تهران که مشغول به کار در کل شهر تهران به تعداد  2953 نفر بودند که بر اساس فرمول کوکران و نوع نمونه گیری طبقه ای و خوشه ای، 360 نفر انتخاب شدند. از تکنیک دلفی و پرسشنامه سنجش برازش مدل استفاده شد. در بخش کمّی نیز، از روش همبستگی پیرسون با نرم افزار Spss-V23 و مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری (تحلیل عاملی تأییدی) و با استفاده از بارهای عاملی برای هریک از شاخص­های مؤلفه­ها و همین­طور مؤلفه­ها توسط نرم افزار Lisrel-V8.8 استفاده شد.  نتایج حاصل از پژوهش نشان دادند که مؤلفه های صلاحیت­های حرفه­ای اعضای هیئت علمی واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی شهر تهران شامل، صلاحیت علمی خبرگی آموزشی، صلاحیت عمومی، صلاحیت رفتاری-اخلاقی، صلاحیت مدیریتی، صلاحیت اندیشه‌ورزی و صلاحیت  اجتماعی- عاطفی بود. همچنین، با توجه به اختلاف میانگین‌ها که مقادیری مثبت هستند، چنین استنباط می‌شود که وضعیت مؤلفه‌ها کلاً در حالت مطلوب اما کمّی بالاتر از میانگین می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Presentation of Professional Competencies Appropriate pattern of Faculty Members of Islamic Azad University branches at Tehran City

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zeinab Abazari 1
  • Mehdi Shariatmadari 2
  • Fatemeh Hamidifar 2
  • Behzad Shoghi 3

1 PhD Student in Educational Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Faculty Member, Department of Educational Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Faculty Member, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Present study was conducted with the aim of providing a suitable model for the professional competency of the faculty members of the Islamic Azad University of Tehran. Research method, was fundamental-applied in terms of purpose. In terms of data type, it was mixed (qualitative-quantitative) of exploratory type; In terms of data collection, it was cross-sectional and in terms of data collection method or the nature of research, it was descriptive survey. The statistical population in the qualitative part of the research included higher education experts who were selected based on purposive sampling. The statistical population of the research in the quantitative section, including all faculty members of Tehran Azad Universities, who were working in the whole city of Tehran, (2953 people), and 360 people were selected based on Cochran's formula and cluster sampling type. Delphi technique and model fitness assessment questionnaire were used. Validity and reliability in the qualitative section were measured and confirmed using quality criteria (reliability). In part, the formality, content, and structure were used to measure validity, and Cronbach's alpha and combination reliability were used for reliability, all of which were confirmed. The method of data analysis in the present study and in the qualitative part was the Delphi technique. In the quantitative part, Pearson correlation method with Spss-V23 software and structural equation modeling (confirmatory factor analysis) and using factor loads for each of the components as well as components by the software Lisrel-V8.8 software was used. The results of the study showed that the components of professional qualifications of faculty members of Islamic Azad University of Tehran included scientific scientific competence of educational expertise, general competence, behavioral-moral competence, managerial competence, intellectual competence competence and socio-emotional competence. Also, considering the difference between the means, which are positive values, it is inferred that the condition of the components is generally in the desired state but slightly higher than the average.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Professional Competency
  • Faculty Members
  • Thinking Competency
Delobbe N, Cooper‐Thomas H D, De Hoe R 2016. A new look at the psychological contract during organizational socialization: The role of newcomers' obligations at entry. Journal of Organizational Denham, S. A., Bassett, H. H., & Miller, S. L. (2017, December). Early childhood teachers’ socialization of emotion: Contextual and individual contributors. In Child & Youth Care Forum (Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 805-824). Springer US.Behavior, 37(6), 845-867.
Elwood S A, Bippert K 2020. Crab-Walking in the Crosswalk: A Standards and Competency Matrix Using ISTE Educator Standards With Teacher Educator Technology Competencies. In Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education (pp. 261-281). IGI Global.
Fathi Vajargah K 2014. Where is the training and improvement of human resources going? (Emerging trends and scenarios), slide presented in the workshop on human resource improvement, Tehran. [In Persian]
Feldman A, Altrichter H, Posch P, Somekh B 2018. Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions. Routledge.
Forsman H, Jansson I, Leksell J, Lepp M, Sundin Andersson C, Engström M, Nilsson J 2020. Clusters of competence: Relationship between self‐reported professional competence and achievement on a national examination among graduating nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol.76, No. 1, Pp. 199-208.
Horowitz, R. (2018). Everyday Arts for Special Education: Impact on Student Learning and Teacher Development. In Arts Evaluation and Assessment (pp. 37-64). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Kaiser G, Blömeke S, König J, Busse A, Döhrmann M, Hoth J 2017. Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers—cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 94, No. 2, Pp. 161-182.
Kiemer K, Gröschner A, Kunter M, Seidel T 2018. Instructional and motivational classroom discourse and their relationship with teacher autonomy and competence support—findings from teacher professional development. European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 33, No. 2, Pp. 377-402.
Lauermann F, König J 2016. Teachers’ professional competence and wellbeing: Understanding the links between general pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and burnout. Learning and Instruction, No. 45, Pp. 9-19.
Maleki Ha 2005. Qualifications of the teaching profession. Tehran, Madrasa Publications. [In Persian]
Morling B, Lee J M 2020. Are “Associate Professors” Better Than “Associate Teaching Professors”? Student and Faculty Perceptions of Faculty Titles. Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 1, Pp. 34-44.
Mousavi F, Abazari Ze 2015. Identifying the professional qualifications of professors and its role on cultural engineering. National Conference on Educational Management in the Age of Information and Communication Technology. [In Persian]
Okereke C I, Nnenna I B 2011. Training, Manpower Development and Job Performance: Perception and Relevance among Civil Servants in Ebonyi State. Nigeria Journal of Economics and International finance, Vol. 3, No. 6, Pp. 399-406. Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD.
 Sabzianpour Z, Islampanah M 2019. Return to management: Designing and explaining the new model of competencies of educational managers by content analysis method. School Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, Pp. 251-229. [In Persian]
Saki R 2015. Course Research, Tehran: Iranian Curriculum Encyclopedia. [In Persian]
Vahedi H, Karami N, Rezaei R, Ismailpour A 2018. Comparison of professional qualifications of teachers among graduates of Farhangian University, former teacher training and other universities. Educational Technology, Vol. 13, No. 1, Pp. 90-83. [In Persian]