مجله توسعه آموزش جندی شاپور اهواز

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

فرآیند داوری

شناسایی مؤلفه های بهبود فرایند خطی مشی گذاری در نظام آموزش عالی کشور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دماوند، ایران.

2 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه مدیریت اموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، دماوند، ایران.

3 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه مدیریت اموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، دماوند، ایران

چکیده

شکاف میان انتظارات اجتماعی و دستاوردهای آموزش عالی، مرتب در حال افزایش بوده است و متولیان آموزشی از شکست­های عینی و ملموس در حوزه آموزش نگرانند. از این رو آموزش عالی برای برخورداری از ساختاری کارآمدتر و قابلیتی بالاتر و دستیابی به کیفیت بهتر، نیازمند واکاوی مستمر فرایند خط مشی­گذاری است ، بنابراین هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسائی مؤلفه­ها و شاخص­های خطی مشی­گذاری در نظام آموزش عالی کشور جهت ارائه الگوی مناسب بود. این تحقیق در پارادایم تفسیری با رویکرد کیفی و مبتنی بر روش نظریه  بنیادی انجام شد. در این تحقیق 12 نفر کارشناس و خبره حوزه سیاست­گذاری و مدیریت آموزشی و از اعضای هیئت علمی دانشکده علوم تربیتی دانشگاه­های دولتی و غیردولتی استان تهران به عنوان نمونه تحقیق در نظر گرفته شدند و از روش نمونه­گیری زنجیره­ای جهت شناسایی و انتخاب خبرگان استفاده شد. به منظور جمع آوری اطلاعات مورد نیاز تحقیق از روش­های مطالعات اسنادی و میدانی استفاده شد و ابزار گردآوری داده­ها مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته بود. از نرم افزارMaxqda2007  جهت کدگذاری باز محوری-گزینشی داده­های گردآوری شده استفاده شد. یافته­هانشان داد مؤلفه­های اصلی خطی مشی­گذاری در نظام آموزش عالی کشور عبارتند از: توجه به مدیریت استراتژیک، گسترش چتر حمایتی، توجه به کیفیت مداری در نظام آموزشی، توجه به زیرساخت­های آموزشی، توجه به  توسعه همه جانبه و توجه به دستاوردهای خط مشی­گذاری در جامعه.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification Components of Improving Policy-making Linear Process in Higher Educational System of Country

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hassan Karimkhani 1
  • Abolghasem Delkhosh Kasmai 2
  • Masoumeh Oladian 3

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran.

2 Faculty member, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran.

3 Faculty member, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The gap between social expectations and the achievements of higher education has been steadily widening, and educational authorities are also concerned about objective and tangible failures in the field of education. There is a need for continuous analysis of the policy-making process to acheive a more efficient structure and higher capabilities and better quality for higher education. For this reason, the aim of present research was to identify the components and indicators of linear policy-making in the country's higher education system to provide a suitable model. This research was conducted in an interpretive paradigm with qualitative approach based on the fundamental theory method. In this study, 12 experts in the field of policy-making and educational management and faculty members of the Faculty of Educational Sciences of public and non-governmental universities in Tehran province were considered as the research sample and chain sampling method was used to identify and select experts. In order to collect the required information, the methods of documentary and field studies were used; inaddition, data collection tools were semi-structured interview; and Maxqda2007 software was used for open-axis-selective coding of the collected data. The outcomes pointed out that the main components of policy making in the country's higher education system were paying attention to strategic management, to quality orientation in the education system, to educational infrastructure, to comprehensive development and to policy achievements in the society and expanding the supports of policy making in the country's higher education system.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Process Improvement
  • Linear Policy Making
  • Higher Education
مراجع
Abbasi T, Beigi V 2016. Explaining the Challenges of Implementing General Policies in the Field of Science, Research and Technology. Tehran: Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 8, No. 3, Pp. 1-12. [In Persian].
Amiri A N, Danaeifard H, Zarei ‌ M, et all 2011. Understanding the Essence of Public Policies: Theoretical Analysis of the Imitability of National Policy Makers. Tehran: Strategic Management Thought, Vol. 5, No. 2, Pp. 89-90. [In Persian].
Arjmandi Gh, Samiei H 2017. Factors of quantitative expansion of higher education and its consequences in Iran from the perspective of elites and educated people, Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational Systems, Vol. 1, No. 2,  p. 91-100. [In Persian].
Attarnia A, Khanifar H, Rahmati M H 2014. A Study of Policy Development in the Informal System of Skills Training in Iran, Tehran: Quarterly Journal of Organizational Culture Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, Pp. 345-374. [In Persian].
Bagheri M R, Pourezat A A 2013. Presenting a Combined Pattern for Policy Making in the University. Tehran: Quarterly Journal of Parliament and Strategy, Vol. 20, No. 74, Pp. 165-199. [In Persian].
Commission on Vision and Elite Affairs of the Expediency Discernment Council 2012. Objectives of the Vision Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Secretariat of the Expediency Discernment Council. Pp. 158. [In Persian].
Danaeifard H, Saghafi E D, Moshbeki Esfahani A 2010. Public Policy Implementation: A Study of the Role of Rationality in the Policy Development Stage, Management Research in Iran, Vol. 14, No. 4, Pp. 41-62. [In Persian].
Danaeifard H, Shagri Z, Fani A A, et all 2016. Presenting a Model of Factors Affecting the Evaluation of the Quality of Public Policies in Iran. Tehran: Military Management, Vol. 16, No. 64, Pp. 42-66. [In Persian].
Gawlicz K, Starnawski M 2018.Educational Policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Legacies of State Socialism, Modernization Aspirations and Challenges of Semi-Peripheral Contexts.Policy Futures in Education, Vol. 16,  No. 4, Pp. 385-397.
Goodarzi A, Ale Rasool S, Alaeipour Ali 2015. A Review of the Functions and Challenges of Higher Education, Strategic Infrastructure Scientific Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 1, Pp. 26-47. [In Persian].
Korkmaz M 2016. " Analytical Report of the Educational System ",  Educational Researsh Quarterly, Pp. 57
Lo W, Yat W 2017. The Recalibration of Neoliberalisation: Repoliticising Higher Education Policy in Hong Kong. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, Vol. 73, No. 5, Pp. 759-773.
Lubienski Ch 2018. The Critical Challenge: Policy Networks and Market Models for Education. Policy Futures in Education, Vol. 6, No. 2, Pp. 156-168.
Ministry of Science, Research and Technology 2012. National Higher Education Planning Document, Pp. 107-108. [In Persian].
Mohammadi M, Alwani S M, MEmarzade Tehran Gh, et all 2017. Designing a Three-Dimensional Model for the Public Administration of Public Policy, Tehran: The Mission of Government Management (Government Management), Vol. 8, No. 26, Pp. 187-190. [In Persian].
Mohtar M 2015. Factors Affecting the Development of Governmental Universities in Malaysia: International Perspective on change. Malaysia & Kuala Lumpur: Rutledge Flamer.
Najaf Beigi R 2010. The Front Line of Cultural Management in Education, Tehran: Barg-e Farhang Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 22, Pp. 106-117. [In Persian].
Nowruzizadeh R, Shafizadeh H, Rouhani Sh 2013. Evaluation and Analysis of the Science and Technology Department of the Fifth Development Plan Law from the Perspective of Extraordinary Documents, Strategy Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 66, Pp. 314-320. [In Persian].
Omidi Y 2013. Performance of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Tehran: Journal of Higher Education Letters, No. 2. [In Persian].
Samari I, Yemeni Dozi Sorkhabi M, Salehi Omran E, et all 2013. Investigation and identification of effective factors in the process of "academic development" in Iranian public universities. Tehran: Management Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 4. Pp. 25-33. [In Persian].
Scott L P, Shoorman D F 2015. Educational management and informed policy making. Journal of organizational behavior. Vol. 19, No. 1, Pp. 47-49.
Shiuan R  2015. “A Study of Political Challenges in the Medical Personnel Training System, Journal of organization behavior, Vol. 24, No. 3.
Silberglit R ,  Howell D R, Anny W 2016. Factors Affecting University Development the Global Technology, In –Depth Analyses, santamonica, CA: RAND National Security Research Division.
Soldado M 2015. A set of standards for assessing the educational system and evaluating the current situation in Spain, journal citation: southern – communication –journal , Vol. 41 , No. 3.
Strauss V 2017. Analysis  Why it's a big problem that so many teachers quit — and what to do about it. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved .
Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution 2011. Comprehensive Scientific Map of the country, Tehran: Secretariat of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, Pp. 111. [In Persian].
Tong D, Yoon K, Rasiah D 2016. The main features of the economy underpin a proper educational system. Organizational Behaveir . Vol. 5, No. 2.
Vice President for Strategic Planning and Supervision 2010. Fifth Five-Year Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Pp. 40. [In Persian].
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
مجله توسعه آموزش جندی شاپور اهواز
دوره 11، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 3
فصلنامه پاییز 99
آبان 1399
صفحه 372-385
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار