نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل ، ایران.

2 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اردبیل، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل ، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به منظور بررسی عوامل مؤثر دانشگاه سازمانی و میزان کاربست آنها درسیستم آموزشی دانشگاه های آزاد اسلامی غرب استان گیلان و ارائه مدل دانشگاه سازمانی انجام گرفته شده است . روش پژوهش از نوع کیفی و کمی بود. جامعه آماری در بخش کیفی شامل رؤسا، معاونین ، مدیران گروه و اعضای هیات علمی و دربخش کمی جامعه آماری اعضای هیات علمی واحدهای دانشگاه آزادغرب گیلان می باشد. برای نمونه گیری در بخش کیفی ازروش نمونه گیری هدفمند ودربخش کمی از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای برحسب واحدها استفاده شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از روش های آمار توصیفی و استنباطی استفاده شد. ، نتایج پژوهش در بخش کیفی بیانگر آن بود که درایجاددانشگاه سازمانی درواحدهای دانشگاهی 9 عامل اصلی و 19 عامل فرعی تاثیر دارند. دربخش کمی پژوهش ، یافته ها نشان دادکه دربین عوامل درون سازمانی عامل سیستم های دانش با بیشترین ضریب استاندارد 77% و دربین عوامل برون سازمانی ، عامل ارتباط با بیشترین ضریب استاندارد 78% تاثیرگذارترین عامل دردانشگاه سازمانی می باشند. درارتباط با میزان کاربست عوامل مؤثردانشگاه سازمانی در سیستم اموزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی نتایج تحقیق دربخش کیفی و کمی نشان داد که کلیه عوامل مؤثر دانشگاه سازمانی درسیستم آموزشی بکار گرفته نمی شود و کاربردی ضعیف دارند . همچنین مدل نهایی پژوهش با شاخص های برازش و ضرایب استاندارد مورد تایید قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the rate of application of effective factors of university organization in educational system of Islamic Azad University and presenting model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoud Emami-Nejad 1
  • Sadruddin sattari 2
  • azam rastgoo 2

1 Ph.D Student in Educational Management, Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

2 Faculty Member of Ardabil Azad University, Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The present study was conducted to investigate the effective factors of corporate university campuses and the extent of their application in the education system of Islamic Azad University of west of Guilan province and presenting a corporate university model. The research method was qualitative and quantitative. The statistical population in the qualitative section consists of heads, deputies, faculty directors and faculty members, and in the small part of the statistical society, faculty members of Azad University of west of Guilan. For sampling in the qualitative section, a targeted sampling method was used and in the small part, a stratified random sampling method was used. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. , The results of the research in the qualitative section indicated that the creation of corporate university campus in academic units had 9 main factors and 19 sub factors. In the quantitative part of the research, the findings showed that among the internal factors of knowledge systems with the highest standard coefficient of 77% and among external factors, the factor with the highest standard factor of 78% is the most influential factor in the corporate university. The results of the quantitative and qualitative research showed that all the effective factors of the corporate university in Educational systems are not used and are weak applied. The final model of the research was approved with fitting indexes and standard coefficients.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • corporate university
  • education system
  • Intra organizational factors
  • External organizational factors
  • Islamic Azad University
Allen, M 2010, The next Generation of corporate universities, Training industry Quartery, VoL.3; No.3, PP25-29.
Allen, M, McGee, P 2005, measurement and evaluation in corporate universities, New direction for institutional research, Vol. 2004, No.124, PP.510-537.
Allen, M 2010, The next Generation Of Corprate Univercities, Sunfrancisco:Pferiffer.
Alonso, A. Peris, M. maurist, J. (2017). Cooperative and networkings Strategies in small business. Newyork: springer.
Alonso, A, Peris, M et al 2018, strategies and practices in social innovation, newyork: Springer.
Ashcroft, P 2013, Foundations of a corporate university, Athabasca university, August 2013, No.1, PP.3-29.
Bazargan, A 2016, Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods, Didar Publishers Tehran.
corbin, J, strauss, A 2008, Basics of Qualitative research, Techniques and procedures For developing Grounded Theory 2nd ed, California:Thousand Oaks.
Falod, H.O, Oludayo, O et al 2018, Employee resourcing strategies and universities, Corporate image, a survey data set, Data in brief, Vol.18, PP.1387-1382.
Gabric, E. Kovac, B 2013, A corporate university The possibilities for its implementation in Slovenia, saarbrucken Germany: LAP (Lambert Academic Publishig).
Giulio, P 2011, The corporate university Phenomenon and the Competences “Pipeline” the role of innovation and institutional change, Us-china public administration, Vol.8, No.9, PP.1004-1015.
Gumusay, A, Marcbohne, T 2018, Individual and organizational inhibitors to the development of entrepreneurial competencies in corporate universities, Elsevier , Vol.47, No.2, Pp.363-378.
Homan, G, Macpherson, A 2005, E-learning in the corporate university, European industial Training, Vol.29, No.1, PP.75-90.
hoseini, A  et al 2018, Hospital enterprise Architecture Framework (Study of Iranian University Hospital Organization), International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol.114, Pp.88-100. (In persian)
Imanipour, M, Aghajani, S 2008, The corporate University, Tehran: Saramad. (In persian)
masannat, J 2014, How should we measure The Effectiveness of our corporate university programs?, Cornell university ILR school, Spring.2014, PP22-26.
Mca teer, P, Pino, M 2011, The Business Case for Creating a Corporate University, Corp/U. September, No.1, PP.2-13.
McGee, P 2006, Corporate unversities; Competitors or collaborators?, Human resource and adult learning, Vol.2, No.4, PP.28-32.
Meyber, K, Allen, M, et al 2014, Minding Their Business by Flexing Our Minds: a guide to Corporate University Partnership, UNICON, No.1, PP. -16
Molayee, Z, Asili, G, et al 2009, Corporate University, Organization Strategy institute, Tadbir Magazine, Vol.2004, PP.16-21.
Moroz, S, moroz, M 2016, The institute of corporate university and its experience for development of labor potential of a classic higher education institution, Theory and practice of management social systems scientific and practical, Vol.387, No.4, PP.22-31.
Naizabekov, A, Bozhko, L et al 2016, Technology implementation in corporate management of modern university.Experience, Problems, Prospective, Energy procedia, vol.95, PP.439-443.
Nielson, B 2010, corporate university; establishing effective education solutions, Capital wave Inc, june 2010, No.1, PP.1-12.
Rajabbeygi, M, Hamidi, L 2014, Corprate University, Management and Accounting Researches, Vol.3, No.3, PP.31-45. (In persian).
Samary, E 2015, Theoretical Foundations for the Development of Higher Education and University system, Afaghe Kalam Publication, Save, First Edition.
Sheng-JU, C, Chia-YU, Y 2017, Governance style in taiwanese universities: features and effects, International jornal of educational development.inpress, PP.1-14.
Simarasl, N, Fayazi, M 2007, Corporate Universities Imperial Employees, Tadbir, Vol.188, NO.5, Pp.39-42. (In persian).
Sinha, A, kaul, N 2013, Corporate universit; Glorified Training dePartments or more?, Resources development and management, vol.1, PP.49-53.
Szoboszlai, V, Velence, J et al 2014, Post-Experiential education: from knowledge to “knowing”, Actapolytechnica Hungarica, VoL.11, No.10, PP.235-245.
Tsipes, G, EchkaloVa, N et al 2016, Corporate university as a driver of proiect culture and competence development procedia, Social and Behavior Science, Vol.226, PP.335-342.
Wang G, G, Sun, J et al 2008, Exploring The corporate university Phenomenon, Eric online, PP.1-8.
Zareekhalili, M, Choopani, H et al 2010, New Approach to Training in Organizations for Comparison with Competitive Environment, Conference of Research and Training Managers, Vol.1, No.52, PP.320-331. (In persian)