مجله توسعه آموزش جندی شاپور اهواز

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

فرآیند داوری

کیفیت برنامه های آموزشی دانشکده ی توانبخشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپوراهواز از دیدگاه اعضای هیأت علمی

نویسندگان

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارزیابی کیفیت برنامه های آموزش توانبخشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز از دیدگاه اعضای هیئت علمی انجام گرفت. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- مقطعی بود. جامعه ی آماری اساتید دانشکده ی توانبخشی دانشگاه جندی شاپور اهواز بود. ابزار گردآوری داده ها پرسشنامه ی محقق ساخته بود که از دو بخش تشکیل می شد. بخش اول متغیرهای دموگرافیکی و بخش دوم ابعاد کیفیت آموزش را می سنجید. این ابعاد شامل 8 بعد ارزش علمی، یادگیری و کاربردی درس، اشتیاق مدرس به درس، روشنی و سازمان بندی مطالب، تعامل گروهی و مشارکت، در دسترس بودن مدرس، جامعیت مطالب آموزش داده شده، امتحان و نمره گذاری، مطالب خواندنی و تکالیف بود و از28 گویه تشکیل شده بود. پاسخ ها بر اساس مقیاس لیکرت امتیازبندی گردید. اعتبار ابزار گردآوری داده ها از طریق تحلیل محتوا تائید شد. در بررسی پایایی ابزار، آلفای کرونباخ 80/0 محاسبه شد. برای تحلیل داده ها از آمار توصیفی(فراوانی مطلق و نسبی) و آمار استنباطی (آزمون تی مستقل، ANOVA و آزمون تعقیبی Tukey) در SPSS20 استفاده گردید. یافته های پژوهش نشان دادند که 5 بعد از ابعاد کیفیت آموزش در دانشکده ی توانبخشی از نظر اساتید کاملاً مناسب و2 بعد دیگر آن نسبتاً مناسب برآورد شد. اما بعد آزمون و نمره گذاری نسبتاً نامناسب برآورد گردید. بین دیدگاه اساتید دارای سابقه ی خدمت کمتر از5 سال با اساتید دارای بیشتر از 15سال در بعد «جامعیت مطالب آموزش داده شده» تفاوت معناداری مشاهده شد P<0.006)). در دانشجویان گروه های توانبخشی که بخش عمده ای از آموزش آن ها عملی است نیاز به آزمون هایی مانند آسکی و داپس ضروری به نظر می رسد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Quality of Educational Programmefrom ViewPointof Faculty Members in Rehabilitation Faculty at Ahvaz JundishapurUniversity of Medical Sciences

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nishteman Ebrahimi
  • Farzad FarajiKhiavi
  • Shahin Goharpey
  • Mohammad Hossein Haghighizadeh

چکیده [English]

This study aimed to evaluate the educational quality of rehabilitati on programmeat Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences from faculty members’point of view. Being a descriptive and cross-sectional research, the population included all faculty members from departmentsin school of Rehabilitation Sciences. In addition, data was gathered via aresearch-made questionnaire consisting of two sections; the first was about respondents' demographic characteristics, and the second was evaluating dimensions of education quality;it included 8 dimensions (Learning/Value-five items, Instructor Enthusiasm-four items, Organization-three items, Group Interaction-three items, instructor availability-??, Individual Rapport-three items, Breadth of Coverage-five items, Examinations/Grading-three items, Assignments/Readings-two items and 28 items thatwere scored by Likert scale. Moreover,the validity of the instrument of data collection was confirmed by using content validity, and to investigate the reliability of the instrument Cronbach's Alpha was run and calculated 0.80. Descriptive statistics (frequency, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (ANOVA and independent t Test and Tukey) were performed for data analysis using SPSS 20. The findings eventually showed that 5 estimated dimensions were quite appropriate and 2 other dimensions were considered appropriate, while the dimension of testing and scoring were perceived relatively inappropriate among educational quality dimensions from of faculty members’ viewpoint. In addition, mean scores of viewpoints from faculty members who served less than 5 years and those who served more than 15 years showed a significant difference in comprehensiveness ofeducational materialsdimension (P<0.006). Hence, it can be concluded that as the majorityof the educations inrehabilitation departmentsarepractical, therefore, performing more practical evaluation methods such as OSCE and DOPS seems necessary.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • The Education Quality
  • Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
مراجع
1-Arasli, H, Smadi, MS, Katircioglo, TS, 2005,Customer service quality in the Greek banking industry , Managing service quality, Vol. 15, No. 1, Pp. 41- 56.
     
2-Adamu, YA, Addamu, MA, 2012, Quality assurance in Ethiopian higher education: Procedures and practices. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences,Vol. 6, Pp. 838 – 846.
     
3-Azar, A, Gholamrezaei, D, Danaee, H,et al 2013, An Analysis of Quality Challenges of Higher Education؛Case: The Fifth Development Plan, Strategy for Culture,Vol.6, No.21, Pp. 139-172. (Persian)
     
4-Abdi, K, Madah, B, Rhgozar, M, et al 2013,Designing the valid indexes for assessment of situation of clinical education in rehabilitation courses, Journal of Medical Education Development, Vol.5, No.9, Pp.23-32.(Persian)
     
5-Banidavoodi, Sh, 2014, The Comparison of Characteristics of Effective Teaching from Students’ Perspective in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Biannual Journal of Medical Education, Vol.2, No.2, Pp.7-13.(Persian)
     
6-Behwshti Rad, R,Ghalavandi, H, Ghale’ei, A, R,2014, Faculty Members Performance Evaluation by Nursing Students; Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Quarterly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences,Vol.6, No.4,Pp.223-228.( Persian)
     
7-Bogdanel, MD, 2011 ,Quality management in higher education service, Procedia Social and Behavioral Science ,Vol. 15, Pp.3366–3368.
     
8-Foroughi,A, Ahmad A, Yarmohammadian, M , etal 2011,Assessment of quality of education a non-governmental university via SERVQUAL model, Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Vol. 15, Pp . 2299–2304.(Persian)
     
9-Fakhri, M, Yaghobiyan, M, Mohseni, M, et al 2010, Reliabilityquality assessment toolteachers, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Vol .21, No. 86, Pp. 38-46.( Persian)
     
10-Geshmerd, R, Motemedi, N, Vahedparast, H, 2011,The views ofteachers and studentsofBushehr University of Medical SciencesCharacteristics ofa good teacher, Iranian Journalof Medical Education, Vol.11, No. 1, Pp.48-57.( Persian)
     
11-Ghaforiyan, BM, Shakorniya, H, Elhampour, H, 2006, Medical Universityof Ahvazviewsaboutfactors affectingtheir evaluation score, Journalof Medical EducationDevelopment Center, Vol. 3, No.1, Pp. 19-25.( Persian)
     
12-Hadadnia, S, Shahidi, N, 2010, Viewpointson the effect ofuniversity facultyin-service trainingofeducational quality, Journalof EducationalLeadership andManagement,Islamic Azad University Garmsar, No.4, Pp. 23-54.( Persian)
     
13-Hazavehei, SMM, Fathi Y, Shamshiri, M 2006, The study of the causes of students` academicprobation in Hamadan University , Journal Medical Science,Vol. 3, N O. 1, Pp. 33-42.
     
14-Khorasani, A, Mohammadi, A M, 2010, Organizational shortcomings and its solutions from viewpoint of managers and staff, Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, Vol.3, No.5, Pp. 126- 142.(Persian)
     
15-Khorasani, GH, VahidShahi, K, ShahbazNejad, L, et al 2006, Assess the quality of clinical education from the perspectives of teachers and students of the Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Journalof Mazandaran Universityof Medical Sciences, No .17, Pp.87-100.( Persian)
     
16-Lee, WJ, Tai, WS, 2008, Critical Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction and Higher Education in Kazakhstan, International Journal of Management in Education , Vol. 2, Pp. 46-59.
     
17-Mohamadi, HM, Alirezaei, M, Shabanali, H, et al 1393, Factors affectingthe quality ofsecondaryeducationin agriculture Case Studs,AgriculturalEconomicsandDevelopmentResearch,Vol. 54, No. 1, Pp. 105-114. (Persian)
     
18-Mazloomy, M S, Norouzi, S, Norouzi, A, etal 2012, Educational needs of faculty members of ShahidSadoughi University of Medical Sciences in 2011, Journal of Medical Education and Development, Vol. 7, No. 3, Pp. 79-92.(Persian)
     
19-Marghati-Khoei, E, Zareie, F, Dastoorpour, M, etal 2013, Exploring the teaching and learning approaches from the viewpoint of postgraduate students and their lecturers, Journal Ihepsa , Vol. 1, No. 3, Pp.67-82.(Persian)
     
20-Nobakht, M, Rodbari, M, 2012, Studentsassessthequality of instructionat Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Journalof Medicineandpurification, No. 1, Pp. 22- 26.( Persian)
     
21-Nori, A, Asadi, B, Rezazadeh,2007, Development oftraining Jondishapour, TeachingQuality Assessment Fuzzy MCD Mtechnique, Knowledge Management, Vol.20, No. 78, Pp. 139-160.(Persian)
     
22-Seifuashemi, M. Beydokhti, M, yazdiha, M,et al 1999, Internal evaluation as a means of promoting the quality of education in the department of pediatrics of Semnan university of medical sciences,Journal of SemnanUniversity of Medical Sciences, Vol.2, No, Pp.167-175.(Persian)
     
23-Siamain, H, BalaGhafari, Z, Aligolbani, K, 2012, Characteristics of a Good University LecturerAccording to Students, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 96, Pp. 105-111.( Persian)
     
24-Shahki, k, Hoseinpour, D, Maharlo, RM, et al, 2013, Students'viewsabout thequalit yofhealth servicesmanagement Universityof Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Development of training Jundishapur, Vol.4,No.1, Pp.83-89.(Persian)
     
25-Yarmohammadian, M, Mozaffary, Saghaeiannejad, ES 2011,Evaluation of quality of education in higher education based on Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) Model. Social and Behavioral Sciences,Vol. 15, Pp.2917–2922.(Persian)
     
26-Yusof, MA, Abubakr, RN, Mahbob, HM, 2012, The dynamics of student participation in classroom: observation on level and forms of participation, Journal Social and Behavioral Sciences,Vol.59, Pp .61-70.
     
مجله توسعه آموزش جندی شاپور اهواز
دوره 7، شماره 4
دی 1395
صفحه 275-285
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار