نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

2 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده روانشناسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

3 عضو هیئت علمی گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده روانشناسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

4 عضو هیات علمی، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد ساوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساوه، ایران

10.22118/edc.2022.317971.1959

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف فراتحلیل رهبری پژوهشی در توسعه آموزشی و خلق دانش در دانشگاه ها انجام گردید. 
 روش کار: این مطالعه از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش توصیفی با رویکرد فراتحلیل به دنبال شناسایی مؤلفه های رهبری پژوهشی در توسعه آموزشی و خلق دانش در دانشگاه‌ها می‌باشد. گردآوری داده ها، به صورت کیفی انجام شده است، به این صورت که ابتدا 160 مقاله به عنوان جامعه آماری جستجو و دسته بندی شد .پس از بررسی، 50 مقاله داخلی و خارجی بین سال های 1391 تا 1400  (معادل میلادی 2012 تا 2021) به صورت هدفمند جهت شمارش فراوانی کلیدواژه ها انتخاب شد. جهت تایید یافته ها در مرحله بعد پرسشنامه ای طراحی و برای 60 نفر از اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه ها با استفاده از روش دلفی در دو مرحله ارسال شد و با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS و آزمون توافقی کندال مشخص شد.
یافته ها: با استفاده ازکدگذاری مقوله ها با 8 دسته بندی شامل (انگیزه های رهبری پژوهشی)، (توسعه فکری رهبری پژوهشی)، (توسعه رفتاری رهبران پژوهشی)، (توسعه هویت حرفه ای در رهبری پژوهشی)، (سبک رهبری پژوهشی)، (موانع رهبری پژوهشی)، (زمینه ضروری رهبری پژوهشی)، (توسعه مهارت های تیم سازی) شناسایی شد. با استفاده از مقایسه میانگین ها در آزمونT تک نمونه ای و شدت اثر (کوهن)، یافته ها نشان داد که توسعه هویت حرفه ای در رهبری پژوهشی با 28/0 درصد و توسعه مهارت های تیم سازی با 15/0 و انگیزه های رهبری پژوهشی و توسعه فکری در رهبری پژوهشی با 14/0 درصد شدت اثر نقش دررهبری پژوهشی دارند. 
نتیجه گیری: توسعه هویت حرفه ای در رهبری پژوهشی و توسعه مهارت های تیم سازی با 91/0 درصد توافق بیشترین اهمیت را داشتند . مقایسه نتایج فراتحلیل و پاسخ خبرگان یکسان و حاکی از این بود که توسعه هویت حرفه ای و توسعه مهارت های تیم سازی  با اهمیت ترین مولفه های رهبری پژوهشی هستند .


 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Meta-analysis of research leadership in educational development and knowledge creation in universities

نویسندگان [English]

  • shabnam pajohesh 1
  • fatmh parasth gombvani 2
  • Mozhgan Abdolahi 3
  • Amir Hossein Mohammad Davoudi 4

1 PhD student in Educational Management, Faculty of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Faculty member, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

3 Faculty member of the Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

4 Faculty member, Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Humanities, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: The present study was conducted with the aim of meta-analysis of research leadership in educational development and knowledge creation in universities.
Method: This study in terms of purpose was practical and in terms of descriptive method with meta-analysis approach aimed to identify the components of research leadership in educational development and knowledge creation in universities.  The data collection has been done in a qualitative way, in such a way that first 160 articles were searched and categorized as a statistical population. Data collection has been carried out in a qualitative way, in such a way that first 160 articles were searched and categorized as a statistical population It was selected purposefully to count the frequency of keywords. In order to confirm, in the next step, a questionnaire was designed and sent to 60 university faculty members using the Delphi method in two stages, and it was determined using spss software and Kendall's consensus test.
Findings: Using categorical coding with 8 categories including (motivations of research leadership), (intellectual development of research leadership), (behavioral development of research leaders), (development of professional identity in research leadership), (research leadership style), (obstacles to leadership research), (necessary field of research leadership), (development of team building skills). In the first part, by comparing the averages in the one sample T-test, the findings showed that the development of professional identity in research leadership with 0.28% and the development of team building skills with 0.15% and the motivations of research leadership and intellectual development in leadership. A research with 0.14 percent of the intensity of the effect has a role in research leadership.
Conclusion: Development of professional identity in research leadership and development of team building skills were the most important with 0.91% agreement. Comparing the results of the meta-analysis and the answers of the experts were the same and indicated that the development of professional identity and the development of team building skills are the most important components of research leadership.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • research leadership
  • research development
  • education development
  • research professional identity development
  • research team
Amiri Farahabadi J, Abu al Qasimi, M, Ghahremani M. (2016). Pathology of the policy research process in the Iranian higher education system; A qualitative study, interdisciplinary studies in the humanities.32.139-171. [In Persian].
Atash roz M, Poor Moghadasi A, Marashi M. (2017). Assessing the quality of teaching of faculty members from the perspective of students (Case study: Farhangian Universities of North Khuzestan), Quarterly Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies. 8, 23. 49-79. [In Persian].
Azad N, Anderson H, Brooks A, Garz O, Neil C, Misty M. Jenelle L. (2017). Leadership and Management Are One and the Same, Journal List, Am J Pharm Educ, v .81 (6).
Azarakhsh A, Sarai H, Sarukhani, B. (2016). A Study of the Hierarchy of the Student Reference Group of Razi University of Kermanshah, National Studies. 65, pp. 90-71. [In Persian].
Bavik Y, Tang P, Shao   R, Wai L (2018). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths, The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 2, 322-332.
Borghi J, Abrams S, Lowenberg D, Simms S, Chodacki J. (2018). Support Your Data: A Research DataManagement Guide for Researchers Research Ideas and Outcomes. 4: 2643.
Cetin M, Kinik, F. S (2015). An Analysis of Academic Leadership Behavior from the Perspective of Transformational Leadership, Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 207, 20, 519-527.
Chigwada, J, Chiparausha B, Kasiroori J. (2017). Research Data Management in Research Institutions in Zimbabwe. Data Science Journal, 16: 31, pp. 1–9
Choobani, Musa; Naimi, Ebrahim. (2015). A Study of Students' Research Perspective and Their Scientific-Ethical Commitment, The Culture of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 21. 124-109. [In Persian]
Edmondson A C., Harvey J. (2018). Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations, Human Resource Management Review. Volume 28, Issue 4, December. Pages 347-360.
Elrehail, H. (2018). The relationship among leadership, innovation and knowledge sharing. A guidance for analysis, Data in Brief, 19, 128-133.
 Fattahi R, Parirok M, Salari M, Salari M, Rajabali Begloo R, Pazouki F. (2016). Strategies and operational plan of research management system in libraries and information centers (research sample: Organization of Libraries, Museums and Documentation Center of Astan Quds Razavi), National Library and Information Studies Studies. 105, pp .62-43. [In Persian].
Feshnalj L, Bazargan A. (2014). How to internationalize a university in the functions of education, research and specialized services: a case of an international university, management and planning in educational systems. pp. 9-27. [In Persian].
Ghorchian N, Vaezi H. (2016). Policy Analysis in the New Generation of Universities: An Effective Model for Higher Education in Iran, Fourth National Conference on Higher Education. [In Persian].
Gibert A, Tozer WC., Westoby, M. (2017). Teamwork, Soft Skills, and Research Training, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Volume 32, Issue 2, 81-84.
Heydari H, Jafari H. (2017). The effect of the quality of academic research on economic growth in selected countries of Mena, research and planning in higher education, 84, 71-92. [In Persian].
Hosseinpour Toulazdehi S, Zeinabadi H, Abdullahi B, Abbasian H. (2018). Research-oriented teaching and learning in a construction-oriented environment: model design based on phenomenological research, education. 132, 30- . [In Persian].
Huang J, Hung. (2018). Building the science of research management: What can research management learn from education research? The journal of research administration, (49) 1, 11-30.
Irsheid E. A. (2018). Involvement in Leadership Process in Schools and its Impact on increasing their Academic achievement in Jordanian Schools. The International Journal of Education and Researc Case of Schools in Ramtha City. Vol. 6 No .9.
Jalilian S, Yassinifrid T, Azimour, Ehsan, Nejati, Wajih. (2018). Investigating the effective factors on research experiences of postgraduate students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 11th National Conference on Quality Assessment of University Systems, May 6 and 7, 2017. [In Persian].
Keikha J, Hoveida R, & Yaqubi N. (2018). Investigating the effect of intelligent leadership on the educational performance of faculty members of public universities in Zahedan with the mediating role of critical thinking, A new approach in educational management. No .35 Scientific, pp .61-84. [In Persian].
KılıçogluD. (2018). Democratic Leadership of School Principals Related to Distributed Leadership in Schools? Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, V 13, N 3.
Lander J & Seeho, FosterK. (2018). Learning Practical Research Skills Using an Academic Paper Framework. An Innovative, Integrated Approach, Health Professions Education, In press, corrected proof, Available online 27 June.
Leonard H S, Lang F. (2010). Leadership Development via Action Learning, in Advances in Developing Human Resources 12 (2):225-240.
Mabey C, Nicholds. (2015). Discourses of knowledge across global networks: What can be learnt about knowledge leadership from the ATLAS collaboration, International Business Review. Volume 24, 1, 43-54.
Mahdinezhad, Maryam & Mansor, Mahaliza & Rmbeli, Norimah &Emilda Hashim, Shahhosseini, M. (2018). Effective Academic Leadership: Key Aspects of Leader Behavior in Higher Education, Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society. .8 .9. 657-665.
Meerah T, Subahan M. (2012). Developing an Instrument to Measure Research Skills, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 17, 630-636.
Mehdi R. (2015). The Future of Higher Education: Strategies and Consequences of University Adaptation to the Environment and Society, Management and Development Process. 91, 31-54. [In Persian].
Mohammad Davoodi A, Ghorchian N, Moghimi T, Sabzevari M. (2014). The relationship between research ethics and spiritual intelligence with the scientific spirit of students in the Faculty of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Educational Management Innovations. 37. 93-119. [In Persian].
Mohammad Davoodi A, Pajohesh Sh. (2014). Evaluation of Joint Leadership Model in Knowledge Creation Team in Razi University of Kermanshah Faculty Members, A new approach in educational management. 6, 21, 123-146. [In Persian].
Mohseni H. (2018). Pathology of International Scientific -International Cooperation in Iranian Higher Education, Socio-Cultural Strategy, 22, 181-167. [In Persian].
Mousavi Jahromi Y, Nobakt Y. (2017). Explaining the style of leadership and research management in Tehran province, Payame Noo University, Information Management and Knowledge “. 2, 75-9. [In Persian].
Nghban Z, Javidi Kalateh Jafarabadi T, Ahanchian M. (2016). Factors affecting the choice of the topic of the dissertation of graduate students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, standard of research in the humanities.
Nowruzi A, Abolghasemi M, Qahramani M. (2015). Investigating Barriers to Science Production from the Perspective of Shahid Beheshti University Faculty Members, A New Approach in Educational Management. 22. 108-77. [In Persian].
Pajohesh sh, Mohammad Davoodi A, Karam Afrooz M. (2015). Joint Leadership of the Vision of Science-Producing Universities and a Strong Step in the Commercialization of the University, International Conference on Business Development and Excellence, Tehran. [In Persian].
Panahi M, Pourkarimi J, Ramadan, M. (2018). Providing a model of professional competence of research managers in research-based organizations. Organizational Resource Management Research. 8 (1): 23-46[In Persian].
Parasamein K. (2017). Social Factors Affecting the Formation of Higher Education Perversions with Emphasis on the Documentary Orientation. Social Research. 37. 23-14. [In Persian].
Pearce J. M. (2018). Ensuring technical competency for management of research-focused organizations, The Journal of High Technology Management Research. Volume 29, Issue 2 ,172-180.
 Philip J. (2018). An application of the dynamic knowledge creation model in big data. Technology in Society, 54, 120-127.
Podsakoff, Podsakoff, N P. (2018). ..Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability, Leadership Quarterly. In press, corrected proof, 17.
Portahamasbi S, Kazemi V, Rastin, Ibrahim H, Seyed H, Layeghi N. (2017). The role of knowledge leaders in knowledge-based activities and innovative performance in Guilan University of Medical Sciences. No. 28 .18. 103 - 120. [In Persian].
Rafiei Atani. (2017). An Approach to Fundamental Theorizing in the Humanities Based on Islamic Philosophy, Proceedings of the International Congress of Islamic Humanities .3 - 1.42-17 [ In Persian].
Saeedi Y, Arasteh M, Zeinabadi H. (2015). Characteristics of a Good Supervisor from the Perspective of Graduate Students: A Qualitative Study, Higher Education Curriculum Studies in the Seventh. 13. [In Persian].
Sangari N. (2017). Development of a model of central competencies of the members of the Islamic Board (studied by Al-Zahra University), Management in the Islamic University, Year 6 - Number 1, pp. 60-45. [In Persian].
Sedghi Bukani N, Seyed Abbaszadeh M, Qalavandi H, Hassani M. (2017). Analysis of Multiple Relationships between Effective Leadership and Strategic Planning with Manpower Productivity in Higher Education Centers of West Azerbaijan Province, Productivity Management (Beyond Management. 12. 45. 31. 69. [In Persian].
Serkan A, Aylin A, kızılboğa R. (2014). The Relationship between Perceived Academic Leadership Style and Support for Strategic PlanningProcedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 143, 14, 897-901.
Shakibai z, Ghorchian N, Khalkhali A. (2008). Presenting a Model for Creating University Research in the Iranian Higher Education System, Leadership and Educational Management,9. 16 - 69. [In Persian].
Sharifi M, Karimi F, Saeidian N. (2016). A Study of the Components of Transnational Higher Education in Iranian Higher Education, Fall 2016- No. 48, pp. 37-70. [In Persian].
Shirbegi N, Azizi N, Bahrami Sh. (2017). Anatomy of the concept of "graduate": a qualitative analysis of the perceptions and experiences of graduate students and faculty members, research and planning in higher education "Summer 2017 - No. 84 24, pp 25-48. [In Persian].
ShresthaA, Steel A Cater. (2018). Benefits and relevance of International Standards in a design science research project for process assessments, Computer Standards & Interfaces, Volume 60. 48-56.
SoleimaniM, H, Gholizadeh R, Khorakian A. (2016). Factors driving and inhibiting the establishment of companies located in the Humanities Development Center of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Entrepreneurship Development, No. 31, pp. 97-79. [In Persian].
Sousa, M, Rocha Á. (2018). Strategic Knowledge Management in the Digital Age: JBR Special Issue Editorial, Journal of Business Research, Volume 94, Pages 223-226.
Stanley D, Anderson U. (2015). Advice for running a successful research teamNurse researcher 23 (2):36-40.
Taghizadeh Kermani N, Hosseinghlizadeh R, Javidi Kalateh, Jafarabadi T. (2015). Pathology of knowledge production in humanities research centers, Culture Strategy, 30, 188-116. [In Persian].
Vahidi Nasab H, Ghaleh, A. (2014). A Study of the Difference between the Leadership Style of Urmia University Professors from the Perspective of Students with Different Demographic Characteristics, International Conference on Humanities and Behavioral Studies, Tehran.  [In Persian].
Zeinabadi H, Moradi Barzel Abad R, Yasini A, Taban M. (2016). Research environment, quality of student-teacher interaction and self-efficacy. Research: Presenting a Pattern, Fifth Year. 2, 339-358. [In Persian].