نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد دماوند، دماوند، ایران.

2 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد دماوند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دماوند، ایران

10.22118/edc.2022.366033.2193

چکیده

مقدمه: فرآیندهای یاددهی - یادگیری، رویکردی است که در آن فراگیران فرصتی برای معنادار سازی اطلاعات و تمرکز بر مهارتهای تفکر سطح بالا می یابند. هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدلی مناسب برای فرآیند یاددهی– یادگیری در نظام دانشگاهی کشور است.
روش کار: پژوهش حاضر توصیفی-کاربردی است و  و به روش آمیخته انجام شده است. ابزار گرد آوری داده ها پرسشنامه بود. تعداد 269 نفر از کلیه مدیران، معاونین، اساتید و کارکنان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد دماوند، در این پژوهش مشارکت داشتند. تجزیه و تحلیل داده های جمع آوری شده، به دو روش توصیفی و استنباطی انجام شد.
نتایج: یافته های نشان داد که مولفه نگرش های شغلی، آموزشی و انگیزه یادگیری، مولفه آمادگی و خودکارآمدی دانشجو، مولفه های مشارکت فعال در یادگیری، انگیزه و نگرش به انتقال، هنجار درونی و کنترل رفتاری ادراک شده و یادسپاری، کیفیت نیازسنجی و زمان‌بندی دوره‌های آموزشی، کیفیت شایسته‌گزینی و ویژگی‌های حرفه‌ای مدرسان دوره، ویژگی‌های محتوای ارائه شده و کیفیت ارزشیابی یادگیری، دسترسی به مدرسان و منابع کمکی، حمایت (همکاران، مسئول آموزش و مدیران ارشد)، فرهنگ یادگیری سازمانی، حمایت (همکاران و مدیران ارشد) به عنوان متغیرهای فرآیند یاددهی– یادگیری در نظام دانشگاه در نظر گرفته شد.
نتیجه گیری: با توجه به یافته ها در نهایت مولفه «حمایت و سیستم جبران خدمت و فرصت کاربست» تحت عنوان «مولفه‌های فرآیند یاددهی– یادگیری در نظام دانشگاه» مورد تائید قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing a Suitable Model for Teaching-learning Process in University System of Country

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahmood Asadi 1
  • Mohammadtaghi Imani 2
  • Masoumeh Oladian 2

1 PhD student, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Damavand Branch, Damavand, Iran.

2 Faculty Member, Department of Educational Management, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The purpose of this research was to present an appropriate model for the process of education in the country's university system.
Method:  In terms of purpose, research was practical and was done in an exploratory method. The technique of data collection was a mixed method (quantitative and qualitative) by using a questionnaire. Therefore, on this basis, 269 people from all managers, assistants, professors and employees of the Islamic Azad University of Damavand branch cooperated in this research. The analysis of the collected data was done in two descriptive and inferential ways.
Findings: After conducting the research, the results exposed the component of occupational and educational attitudes and learning motivation; the component of student preparation and self-efficacy; the component of active participation in learning; the component of motivation and attitude to transfer; the component of internal norm and perceived behavioral control and Yadasapari; the quality component of needs assessment and scheduling of training courses; the quality component of merit selection and professional characteristics of the course instructors; the component of the features of the content provided and the quality of learning evaluation; the component of access to instructors and auxiliary resources; the support component (colleagues, training officers and senior managers); the component of organizational learning culture; support component (colleagues and senior managers) were considered as variables of the teaching-learning process in the university system.
Conclusion: According to the results, finally, the component "support and service compensation system and employment opportunity" under the title "components of the teaching-learning process in the university system" was approved.
 
Providing a Suitable Model for Teaching-learning Process in University System
Introduction: Teaching-learning processes are an approach in which learners have the opportunity to make information meaningful and focus on high-level thinking skills in order to build knowledge and create information that is useful for applying in the real world. The study of the development process in the world indicates the fact that higher educational systems have always been the fundamental factor in the economic, social and cultural evolution and development of societies. It has been proven that the current society has assigned unique, necessary and important tasks to the university. Today's extensive, dynamic and complex developments and transformations require that universities always learn, develop, and of course, apply new mental and practical attitudes and patterns. On the other hand, in the age of globalization, where educational centers are exposed to the competitive and complex global environment, the existence of a dynamic and efficient educational approach or a theory in a university that wants to be a pioneer in its specialized field and environment is a fundamental challenge, and as well a vital factor in success. In the current state of Iran's higher educational system, the most important task of professors can be considered to be the management of the teaching-learning process. A process is the result of the interaction between the teacher and the learner, and also the factors that generate the teaching-learning system. Expanding professors' understanding and recognition of teaching and learning in higher education can lead to the recognition of their strengths and weaknesses in the management of the teaching and learning process. Moreover, the correction and improvement of this processrequire the existence of suitable frameworks or models that can provide a simple basis for familiarization, reflection, and action of academic staff members in the field of evaluation and development of their activities in the field of teaching-learning process. Therefore, the aim of the current research was to provide a suitable model for the teaching-learning process in the Nation's University system.
Materials and methods: Since in applied research, the main goal is not only scientific discovery, but testing and checking the application of knowledge, so the method of this research was practical in terms of the goal and it was carried out in an exploratory way. The method of data collection was done in a mixed method (quantitative and qualitative), accordingly, the tool of data collection was interviews with experts by conducting specialized interviews; and in the quantitative part, also by the method of inferential analysis and data description; and using factor analysis to analyze the questionnaire data. Sampling was finished through the successive distribution of researcher-made questionnaires as its collection, revision and modification. Then the statistical population in the quantitative part of this research was all managers, professors and university employees a number of 900 people. In order to calculate the sample size, one of the most widely used methods, namely Cochran's formula, was used. Based on this, a sample size of 269 people, from all managers, assistants, professors and employees of Islamic Azad University of Damavand branch, participated in this research. Next, library methods (reading books, articles, magazines, research projects and databases (Internet)) as well as a researcher-made questionnaire were used to collect data related to literature and theoretical foundations formulated hypotheses and presented the initial model of the subject. The analysis of the collected data was also done in a descriptive and inferential way through SPSS 16 and Smart PLS software.  Accordingly, descriptive statistics including frequency, frequency percentage, frequency distribution table, drawing graphs and also describing the response characteristics were used to describe the data. Finally, questionnaires were used and the data was analyzed in the inferential analysis using the factor analysis method.
Findings and discussion: According to the results,  the component of occupational and educational attitudes and learning motivation, the component of student preparation and self-efficacy, the component of active participation in learning, the component of motivation and attitude to transfer, the component of internal norm and perceived behavioral control and  rememberance, the quality component of needs assessment and scheduling of training courses, the quality component of merit selection and professional characteristics of the course instructors, the component of the features of the content provided and the quality of learning evaluation, the component of access to instructors and auxiliary resources, the support component (colleagues, training officers and senior managers), the component of organizational learning culture, support component (colleagues and senior managers) were considered as the variables of the teaching-learning process in the university system.
Conclusion: Finally, the component of support and service compensation system and the opportunity to apply was approved under the title of the components of the teaching-learning process in the university system.
According to RMSEA, RMR, NFI, CFI and finally AGFI calculated for the whole model, the fit of the model waz approved. In the end, it is necessary to explain that the value of RMSEA and RMR less than 0.8, GFI and AGFI above 90% and close to one, all indicated the validity of the model. All these indicators had favorable values. In the current model, the components of the teaching-learning process in the country's university system including; the component of occupational, educational and motivational attitudes, the component of student preparation and self-efficacy, the component of active participation in learning, the component of motivation and attitude to transfer, the component of internal norm and perceived behavioral control and memberance, the quality component of needs assessment and scheduling of training courses, the quality component of merit selection and professional characteristics of the course instructors, the component of the features of the content provided and the quality of learning evaluation, the component of access to instructors and auxiliary resources, the support component (colleagues, training officers and senior managers), the component of organizational learning culture, support component (colleagues and senior managers), and finally support component and service compensation system and employment opportunity) were considered as observed variables 1 and teaching-learning process variable in the university system as latent variable 2.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • teaching-learning process Ray
  • university system
  • quality of education
Ebrahimzadeh S. (2013) in a research with the topic of "Investigating the effect of knowledge management on learning systems" B Education and Development of Human Resources ". [In Persian]
Pervizrad M, Roz Bahani R, Mumtaz H. (2014). Comprehensive book of management. Third edition, Tehran: Mehraban Kitab Institute Publications. [In Persian]
Vajari D, Abbasi A, Fathi Vajarghah M. (2016). Identifying organizational factors affecting the transfer of education to the workplace Journal: Management and Development Process. [In Persian]
Reza Panahi F, Karam Elah H, Porzaren Z (et al). (2016). Creativity: basics and methods of research. Tehran: Hazare Qoqnos Publications. [In Persian]
Hashemi R, Alipour Asadi D. (2018). Victory platform innovation (practical guide in transformation management leadership and organizational renewal). Translated by Abdul Reza Rezainejad. Tehran: Rasa Publishing House. [In Persian]
Rezaei A M, Hasanpour K, Ragheb E. (2014). Psychology of development (from childhood to adulthood). First volume. Translated by Yahya Seyed Mohammadi. Tehran: Rushd Publications. [In Persian]
Ghanbari R, Shams Mourkani A, Arefi B. (2017). Pathology of transfer of learning to the work environment, Magazine: Rushd Moalem ». No.37, Pp.36-39. [In Persian]
Lotfi S, Ahanchian V, Karami N. (2016) Investigating factors related to the work environment that affect the use of training in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Journal: New Psychological Research » Summer 2015 – Vol..26, No.16, Pp. 1-16. [In Persian]
Mojtahedzadeh A, Arumugam M. (2011), "Structural relationships between knowledge management, creativity and performance in Iranian industries" Journal: Management and Development Process, winter 2019 – No. 102, Pp. 157-190. [In Persian]
Abili M, Razi H, Razi H (et al). (2014). factors related to the work environment that affect the transfer of education, Journal: Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Sciences » Fall 2011 –No.8, Pp. 19-38. [In Persian]
Shams M. (2012). an introduction to qualitative research methods and mixed approaches in behavioral sciences, Tehran: Dedar. [In Persian]
Shams M, Safaei M, Fatemi Sefat N. (2016). Investigating factors affecting the effectiveness of training and improvement activities. Journal: Research in Educational Systems. [In Persian]
Nik Nazli B,Sheikh Khairudin J. (2018). Investigating the effect of work variables on the transfer of learning Journal: Research in Educational Systems» spring 2017. [In Persian]
Youzbashi (et al). (2016). also organizational categories affecting the transfer of learning. [In Persian]
Yousefi (et al). (2012). "Investigation of the effect of knowledge management on innovation" master's thesis in the field of management, Azad Institute of Higher Education, Sanabad, Faculty of Management and Accounting. [In Persian]
Bairasauskiene L. (2017). Headmaster’s Competencies in Management Area: Evaluating the Significance Level of Managerial Competencies in Lithuanian Comprehensive Schools. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Vol.5, No.1, Pp. 135-142.
Baldwin F, Blume M. (2017). Transformational leadership; Mahwah-New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hennessey B, Amabile T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.61, No.1, Pp. 569–598.
Elkins T, Keller R T. (2014). Leadership in Research and Development Organizations: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. Leadership Quarterly. Vol.14, No.3, Pp. 587–606.
Burke S, Collins K. (2004). Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills. Women in Management Review. Vol.16, NO.5-6, Pp. 244–456.
Boyatzis R E. (2009). "The competent manager: A model for effective performance", New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Comey T. (2004).” Identifying Leadership Competencies to Create a Leadership Succession Plan Process”. National Library of Canada, Master of Art.