Educational Development of Judishapur

Educational Development of Judishapur

Identifying and explaining the facilitators of the heutagogy approach in the training of managers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. student, Department of Educational Management, Ahvaz branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Faculty Member , educational management group, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Faculty member, Educational Management Department, Ahvaz branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
10.22118/edc.2024.456023.2483
Abstract
Propose: This study aims to identify and explain the facilitating factors of the heutagogy approach in the training of managers in Ahvaz city.
Method: This research has a practical purpose and employs a descriptive-analytical method. The research population included all secondary school principals in Ahvaz city (N = 100) who were selected and studied by census sampling method. he research tool was a 30-item researcher-made questionnaire, whose content validity and reliability were confirmed by Cronbach's alpha. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, exploratory factor analysis, Bartlett's test, and the KMO sampling adequacy index.
Findings: The findings showed that the strategic factors that facilitate the heutagogy approach were six components that explain 64.75% of the total variance of the test. The first factor, learning leadership, accounted for 17% of the variance; the second factor; flexible educational-executive structures 13%; The third factor is the creation of electronic infrastructure and platform 11%; The fourth factor, the ability of managers to use electronic equipment, 9%; the fifth factor; Creating an organizational climate for knowledge sharing 8%; The sixth factor, feedback, explains 6% of the variance.
Conclusion: By identifying and implementing the strategic factors that facilitate the heutagogy approach, managers can be supported to continuously improve as self-directed and self-determined learners, thereby fostering a learning organization.
Identifying and explaining the facilitators of the heutagogy approach in the training of managers
 Introduction: Today, humans live in a knowledge society where knowledge creation and learning have become the normal components of human life. The requirements of life in the present age require that individuals and other social institutions continuously learn and adapt themselves to changes. The wonderful new world of synchronization. On the other hand, the world of work has become more unstable and complex, so the rapid rate of change has made it difficult to predict the future of jobs and job needs accurately. For this reason, workplace learning has become a tool through which organizations can gain a competitive advantage. Managers need high-level learning to progress and increase efficiency in current and future job positions, to improve their way of thinking and acting, and related job information and to achieve organizational goals. Due to the many and extensive changes and the complexity of teaching and training, managers need to improve their knowledge and job skills. Training to empower managers so they can operate in a challenging environment seems mandatory and necessary. However, the current training framework for managers' professional development is mainly based on professional standards and pays less attention to active learning during the training course. Today, the professional development of managers based on three approaches of pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy leads to the development of professional knowledge, attitudes, and skills.
Materials and methods: The current research is descriptive-exploratory. The research community included all the principals of secondary schools in Ahvaz city with 10 years of experience and familiarity with the educational approaches of heutagogy (graduates of educational sciences and psychology were familiar with the studied topic) and there were 100 people. The census method was used to collect the samples. To collect data, a researcher-made questionnaire whose content validity was confirmed by experts and which included 25 items and one open question was used. 100 questionnaires were distributed among the target population in order to identify the strategic factors facilitating the heutagogy of secondary school principals in Ahvaz. Finally, 84 questionnaires were returned, which was 84 percent. Descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, exploratory factor analysis, Bartlett's test and sampling adequacy index (KMO) have been used to analyze and analyze information.
Findings: The findings showed that the implementation of heutagogy or self-determination approach has a direct effect on the continuous professional development of managers of organizations.
Conclusion: In general, identifying and explaining the strategic factors of the heutagogy approach and implementing and implementing its effective factors, can increase educational opportunities to a high extent and strengthen the positive attitude towards the learning process, and at the same time, try to remove the obstacles to its implementation. It can help educational managers to improve learning and provide them with countless opportunities. Therefore, based on the perspective of heutagogy, socio-educational developments, and transformations have put new conditions in front of the educational system and administrators. Therefore, the educational approach of self-determination managers is based on self-directed learning processes, and self-determination opportunities are given to them in knowledge discovery to learn and apply system thinking skills and learning ability. and participate in content creation. Also, the heutagogical learning environment has become constructivist and flexible so that learners with internal motivation are actively involved in the learning process and think and reflect on the studied scientific fields with emotional commitment, and from the approach They use deep learning. Finally, it can be safely said that the science of heutagogy is considered an urgent need of today's professional managers.

Highlights

Karim Saeedavi (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Mohammad Hosseinpour (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Gholamhossein barekat (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Keywords

Abili, K. and Mazari, A. (2021). Presenting the heutagogic model of self-development in the electronic context (a model for learning leadership), Digital Transformation Encyclopaedia, Volume 2, Number 1, pp. 1-71. [in Persian]. DOI: 10.22034/DTJ.2021.293786.1016.
Astraki S, Fallahi M (2019) Investigating the relationship between decision-making styles and conflict management solution-oriented strategies in Azna school principals; A new approach in educational sciences, Journal of New Approaches in Educational Sciences (JNAES) 1(1), pp. 68-74. [in Persian]. DOI: 10.22034/NAES.2020.212485.1012.
Fadaei Kivani, Ro Sadat Eshkur, S (2016) The place of education in the development of human resources of today's organizations, Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, Applied Studies in Management Sciences and Development, 2(5) [in Persian].
Gholami, N; Pour Shafii, M.; Shah Talabi, H. and Hossein Abadi B. (2018) Investigating the effective components of teachers' professional growth. Educational Leadership and Management Quarterly 3(2), 167-181. [in Persian].
Jafari, F (2022). Feedback, Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences; Volume 22, Number 34, pp. 240-241. [in Persian].
Jahantighi, F (2022). The relationship of self-determination and progress goals with academic performance, New Ideas Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 15, pp. 112-140. [in Persian].
Romsey, H.; Hosseinpour, M.; Behmai, L. and Nasiri, M. (2021). Identifying, explaining and ranking indicators and factors for the creation and development of knowledge-based companies in the fields of humanities. Librarianship and information. Volume 24, Number 1 (Serial 93), pp: 50-77[in Persian].
Sheykhi Alizade M, Hosseinpour M, Bahmaee L. (2022) Identifying the Factors Affecting the Development of Continuing Medical Education in the University of Medical Sciences. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences)RJMS(; 29 (8)pp :119-127. [in Persian]. https://rjms.iums.ac.ir/form_register.php?sid=1&slc_lang=fa
Soleimani Bahar, Hakimzadeh Rizvan, Karamdoost Norouz Ali (2013) Examining the level of self-determination of virtual course students of Mehr Alborz University according to the principles and components of the hyutagogy approach of theory and practice in the curriculum, Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum, 2(4)pp, 35-60. [in Persian].             
Torfi j; Natghi, F. and Jalalundi, M. (2019). Investigating the place of educational approaches of pedagogy, andragogy and hyutagogy in the development of school teachers' professions, School Management Quarterly, 8th volume, 1st issue, pp. 77-96 [In Persian].
Bansal, A., Jain, S., Sharma, L.,Jain, C., Madaan, M. (2020). Students’ Perception Regarding Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Heutagogy as Teaching–Learning Methods in Undergraduate Medical Education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 23, 1-7.
Blanchard, R. D., Hinchey, K. T., & Bennett, E. E. (2018). Literature Review of Residents as Teachers from an Adult Learning Perspective. Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, April 12, 2011, New Orleans, LA, Online Submission.
Bush, T. (2018). Research on educational leadership and management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Volume: 46 issue: 3, page(s)pp: 359-361.
Hase, Stewart and Kenyon, Chris (2007). Moving from and andragogy to heutagogy: mplications for VET. In Proceedings of Research to Reality: Putting VET Research to Work; Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA). Adelaide, SA, 28-30, March, AVETRA, Crows Nest, NSW.
Hase, S. (2009). Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: Some challenges and aportunities. Impact: Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-learning, 1(1) :43-52. ISSN: 1837-6959 DOI: 10.5043/impact.13.
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2013). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An international journal of complexity and education, 4(1).
Hase, S. (2017). 8skils for the Learning and Learning Leader in the 21 Century. Lisa Marie Blaschke, Chris Kenyon and Stewart Hase.
Maleki, H. (2015). Competences of the teaching profession. Educational Research and Planning Organization.
Jain, A.B., Sharma, L.,Sharma, N., Jain, C., Madaan, M. (2020). Students’ Perception Regarding Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Heutagogy as Teaching–Learning Methods in Undergraduate Medical Education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9, 1-7.
Gregory, S., Bannister-Tyrrell, M., Charteris, J., & Nye, A. (2019). Heutagogy in postgraduate education: cognitive advantages for higher degree online.
Lee, M. J. W., & McLoughlin, C. (2018). Teaching and learning in the Web 2.0 era: empowering students through learner generated content. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 4(10), 21–34.
Nolan, James., & Hoover, Linda, (2011). Educational Supervision and Performance Evaluation of Theory and Practice Teacher, Translated by Bijan Abdollahi (2016), Tehran: Kharazmi University Press.
Reston, V. A. (2020). National Policy Board for Educational Administration. Professional Standards for Educational Leaders. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.