Purpose: The aim of the current research was to provide a Geuine management model with the country's higher education system upon the data foundation method.
Method: research method according to the purpose was fundamental-applied whhile according to the type of data was qualitative- exploratory type. According to the time of data collection, it was cross-sectional; whereas according to the method of data collection or the nature and method of the research, it was a survey. The statistical population of the research included higher education experts. To determine the samples, a non-random sampling method was used, and then 20 people were considered as the sample size using the principle of saturation. Next, semi-structured interview tools were used to collect data. In order to ensure the validity of the instrument in the qualitative part of the research and to ensure the accuracy of the findings from the researcher's point of view, the valuable opinions of professors familiar with this field and university experts, who were experts and informed in this field, were asked and the retest reliability and internal agreement method were used. A topic was used to calculate the reliability of the conducted interviews. The method of data analysis in the qualitative part was the foundational data theory model and the interview method, too.
Findings: The results of the research showed that among the 92 indicators (items) available, 17 main components can be identified.
Conclusion: Finally, the results presented that the components of the core category included genuine thinking, e commitment and process, whereas the effective components included knowledge management, genuine leadership and academic organizational atmosphere. The outcome components included innovative performance and sustainable competitive advantage, and therefore, the fit indicators model interpreted the final model of the research had a good fit.
 
Presenting a Genuine Management Model to Higher Educational System of country using the Data Foundation Method
Introduction: The formation of the universal higher education motto and the increase in social demand to enter it has caused the growth and expansion of universities and higher educational institutions in the last few decades. On the other hand, the challenges facing higher education included globalization, knowledge-based economy, etc. have caused universities and higher educational institutions to take quality seriously, because the quantitative growth and expansion of the higher education system, regardless of quality, can cause problems such as academic failure, over-education in some fields, financial and human resources being wasted. The goal of quality improvement was to make customers satisfied. It has not been possible to set a certain ceiling for quality, therefore, the ceiling of quality can be customer satisfaction, which is not fixed, and the needs and wants of the society change every day, and hence the university should improv according to the changing needs of the society. Reliability, accountability, competence, objectivity, friendliness and good image, empathy, security, and proper planning of expenses, shape the dimensions of quality higher education. Today, paying attention to these dimensions of quality has gained increasing importance and many countries of the world have noticed it. Therefore, the need to respond to the society, increase the quality of higher educational institutions in terms of education, research and the supply of specialized services; and also many other factors are among the reasons for paying attention to the quality of educational systems and the basis for the formation of national and international evaluation and validation institutions. The aim of the current research was to provide a genuine management model with the country's higher educationak system using the foundation data method.
Materials and methods: research method according to the purpose was fundamental-applied; while it was (qualitative) of the exploratory type according to the type of data; and according to the time of data collection, it was cross-sectional; and according to the method of data collection or the nature and method of the research, it was a survey too. The statistical population of the research included higher education experts. To determine the samples, a non-random sampling method was used, consequently, a number of 20 people were considered as the sample size using the principle of saturation. Semi-structured interview tools were used to collect data. In order to ensure the validity of the instrument in the qualitative part of the research and to ensure the accuracy of the findings from the researcher's point of view, the valuable opinions of professors familiar with this field and university experts who were professionals and informed in this field were asked, next the retest reliability and internal agreement method were used. A topic was used to calculate the reliability of the conducted interviews. Finally the method of data analysis in the qualitative part was the foundational data theory model and the interview method.
Results and discussion: In this research, the main source of data was the study of upstream documents and interviews; So that the initial interviews were exploratory and descriptive, and gradually after conducting each interview, the coding of the data from the interviews was done. Through the constant comparison of the data, theoretical codes emerge through open coding, and in the same way, the coding of the 20 interviews and the upstream documents were carried out. The results showed that after content analysis and interviews with experts, the components affecting the compliance of genuine management with the country's higher education system were categorized as knowledge management, genuine leadership and academic organizational climate.Moreover, it included innovative performance, sustainable competitive advantage and educational quality based on the research background, theoretical foundations, interviews with experts and also analyzing the state of dimensions, components and indicators (moving from an unfavorable situation to a favorable one, as well as maintaining and promoting a favorable situation) was the mechanism or implementation strategy of genuine management model adaptation to the country's higher education system. The results of the research presented that among the 92 indicators (items) available, 17 main components can be identified.
Conclusion: To conclude, the components of the core category and in other words the components of the genuine management adaptation model with the higher education system included genuine thinking, genuine commitment and genuine process. In order to adapt the genuine management, they should follow the model proposed by this research as well as to its different levels. In addition, the belief in perfectionism should be instilled in the teaching process to professors, managers and students. For this purpose, the necessary trainings should be provided in order to examine the university's vision and high quality values. The outcomes presented the components of the core category including pure thinking, pure commitment and pure process; and influential components including knowledge management, pure leadership, and academic organizational atmosphere. The subsequent components including innovative performance and sustainable competitive advantage, therefore, the appropriate model indicators showed that the final model of the research had a good fit.